2000
DOI: 10.3133/fs11200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atmospheric Deposition Program of the U.S. Geological Survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Concentrations of these chemical species may significantly decrease in ESRP groundwater influenced by recharge from streams and Mud Lake. Recharge from infiltration of precipitation, surface water, or irrigation return flows may also transport O 2 from the atmosphere, CO 2 from the unsaturated zone, and nitrogen from the soil zone (from wet and dry atmospheric deposition; Nilles, 2000;Rattray and Sievering, 2001) to the aquifer, and may cause a localized increase in natural groundwater concentrations of these chemical species. Groundwater inflow to the ESRP aquifer at and near the INL occurs from tributary valleys north of the INL and regional groundwater northeast of the INL.…”
Section: Natural Rechargementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concentrations of these chemical species may significantly decrease in ESRP groundwater influenced by recharge from streams and Mud Lake. Recharge from infiltration of precipitation, surface water, or irrigation return flows may also transport O 2 from the atmosphere, CO 2 from the unsaturated zone, and nitrogen from the soil zone (from wet and dry atmospheric deposition; Nilles, 2000;Rattray and Sievering, 2001) to the aquifer, and may cause a localized increase in natural groundwater concentrations of these chemical species. Groundwater inflow to the ESRP aquifer at and near the INL occurs from tributary valleys north of the INL and regional groundwater northeast of the INL.…”
Section: Natural Rechargementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although several watershed-scale studies have investigated atmospheric deposition in small headwater basins in the Rocky Mountains (Turk and Campbell, 1987;Caine and Thurman, 1990;Baron, 1992;Reuss and others, 1993;Campbell and others, 1995;Williams and others, 1996;and Burns, 2002), regional-scale atmospheric deposition data are sparse (Nanus and others, 2003). The National Atmospheric Deposition Program (NADP) provides nationwide estimates of atmospheric deposition (Nilles, 2000;National Atmospheric Deposition Program, 2004). Coverage for high-elevation areas [greater than 2,400 m] in the Rocky Mountains, however, is limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deposition of pollutants occurs both by wet (rain and snow) and dry (accumulation of particles and gases) processes, although dry deposition is estimated to account for less than 25 percent of total sulfur and nitrogen deposition in the Western United States (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2008). One way to evaluate the effect of anthropogenic emissions on the environment is with atmospheric monitoring networks that provide long-term consistent data that can be used to track temporal and spatial trends in regional air quality (Nilles, 2000). Such assessments are important to scientists, resource managers, and policymakers for evaluating the effectiveness of regulatory actions on improving the water quality of precipitation and surface water.…”
Section: Trends In Emissions and Atmospheric Deposition In The Rocky mentioning
confidence: 99%