1992
DOI: 10.1016/0032-3861(92)90426-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atomic force microscopy of cellulose microfibrils: comparison with transmission electron microscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
106
0
3

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 171 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
7
106
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Whisker dimensions depend on both the origin of the cellulose and reaction conditions employed. In general, wood and cotton cellulose nano whiskers have a smaller length and cross section compared to those derived from tunicate, bacterial and algae (Hanley et al, 1992;Terech et al, 1999;Grunert & Winter, 2002;Beck-Candanedo et al, 2005), which is in agreement with the degree of crystallinity and the lateral dimension of elementary fibrils. Cellulose nano whiskers exhibit not only a high elastic modulus of 143 GPa (Sturcova et al, 2005), but also show significant changes in electrical, optical, and magnetic properties in comparison to native cellulosic fibers (Samir et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Whisker dimensions depend on both the origin of the cellulose and reaction conditions employed. In general, wood and cotton cellulose nano whiskers have a smaller length and cross section compared to those derived from tunicate, bacterial and algae (Hanley et al, 1992;Terech et al, 1999;Grunert & Winter, 2002;Beck-Candanedo et al, 2005), which is in agreement with the degree of crystallinity and the lateral dimension of elementary fibrils. Cellulose nano whiskers exhibit not only a high elastic modulus of 143 GPa (Sturcova et al, 2005), but also show significant changes in electrical, optical, and magnetic properties in comparison to native cellulosic fibers (Samir et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Tapping mode height images (Hanley et al 1992) of the surface of the dry strand show a pattern of poorly defined corrugations or ridges at an angle of very approximately 60°to the fibril direction (Fig. 7b), corresponding to a shallow righthanded helix.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7a, b). Precise AFM measurements of nanofibril dimensions in cell walls are difficult because of sample-tip artefacts (Hanley et al 1992), but it was possible to dry down individual nanofibrils from celery and image them on a mica surface. Measurement of the height of the isolated nanofibrils gave more reliable values, of the order of 3 nm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resultant cellulose rods, which were measured as approximately 135 glucose residues in length, were thought to represent crystallites of the microfibril. Despite development in microscopic techniques such as scanning electron microscopy (Fengel and Stoll, 1989), atomic force microscopy (Hanley et al, 1992) and scanning tunnelling microscopy (Kuutti et al, 1995) the chain length of such a large molecule as cellulose is still rather difficult to measure. The cellulose molecule in wood was found to be approximately 3500±5000 nm in length when determined by degree of polymerization, as calculated by weight of cellulose molecules isolated by a variety of methods (Fengel and Wegner, 1989), whilst the average size of each crystallite has been determined by X-ray analysis to be 2±20 nm in width and 2±17 nm in thickness (depending on the cellulose sample used).…”
Section: Cellulose Ultrastructurementioning
confidence: 99%