Two-dimensional hydrophobic clusters analysis (IICA) was used to compare the distribution of hydrophobic clusters along various actin sequence. HCA-deduced patterns were not altered by amino-acid variations throughout the evolution of actin and we observed similar hydrophobic motifs comprising myosin subfragment-I ATP-independent binding sites. HCA suggested the presence of two groups of identical hydrophobic motifs (A~ and A2) which bound on each side of the S1 (63 kDa-31 kDa) connecting segment in relation with two actin monomers. This connection is important in communications between actin-and nucleotide-binding sites. We postulate that some relation and message between the two motifs A~ and A 2 take place through myosin subfragment-I (63 kDa-31 kDa) connecting segment.1~ ey words'," Acto-myosin; Hydrophobic cluster; Structure comparison
1~ IntroductionIdentification of the actin-myosin interface is essential in t nderstanding the cyclical enzymatic and mechanical process c f myofibrillar contraction.Atomic resolution of the actin structure [1,2] and the threeciimensional atomic model of F-actin decorated with rabbit ~aymotryptic-S1 [3] or Dictyostelium myosin S1 [4] revealed I ~cations of the myosin head on F-actin. This molecular model f the actin-myosin complex derived from the X-ray structure l zveals a close contact between a myosin subfragment-I and 1 ~o actin monomers. A first contact includes carboxyl residues ,2, 3, 4, 24, 25, 99 and 100. In a second contact, exposed actin 1 ydrophobic residues 144, 341,345,349 and 352 are concerned. "he third contact involves proline residues (332-333) of actin. ~11 of these contacts involve a single monomer. A second mon-~,mer is close to the myosin heavy chain and the interaction i ~cludes the cz-helix formed by actin residues Trp79 to Asn92 flat formed a weak binding contact and was cross-linked [5,6].The Taylor-Amos model [7] of acto-S1 suggests that S1 has n extensive contact with an actin monomer (acl) and a weaker ,. ontact with an adjacent actin monomer (ac2); and two differ-,, nt rigor complexes were suggested [8,9], with SI binding to :-actin occurring in two steps with actin monomers. Using .,uccessively EDC and DMS, we previously cross-linked two lnonomers to 20-kDa and 50-kDa skeletal S1 fragments, re-: Corresponding author. Fax: (33) (67) 60 94 78.spectively [10], and in vitro studies showed that subfragment-I alone can produce the sliding movement of the actin filament [111.Chemical cross-linking [12], NMR [13,14] and immunochemical studies [15,16,[17][18][19][20] have pinpointed actin segments in subdomain-1, residues 1 28, 96-103, 112-125, 338 348 and 360-372 which are able to bind with the myosin head.Furthermore, the (27 kDa-50 kDa-20 kDa) trypsin split myosin subfragment-1, which could no longer be activated by actin, did not bind to the two sites located in the 96-125 region, but it still interacted with the 338-348 and 360--372 segments [191. The presence of hydrophobic interactions in the actin myosin complex have already been sugge...