2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-4073(99)00173-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atomic transition probabilities for Dy I and Dy II

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
92
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
92
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Oscillator strengths were adopted from Wickliffe et al (2000). Data for erbium lines were taken from Lawler et al (2008).…”
Section: Neutron-capture Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oscillator strengths were adopted from Wickliffe et al (2000). Data for erbium lines were taken from Lawler et al (2008).…”
Section: Neutron-capture Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fortunately, most neutron-capture element species considered here have been subjected to extensive laboratory investigations within the past two decades (Biémont et al 1998;Den Hartog et al 2003, 2006Ivarsson et al 2001Ivarsson et al , 2003Lawler et al 2001aLawler et al ,b,c, 2004Lawler et al , 2006Lawler et al , 2007Lawler et al , 2008Lawler et al , 2009Ljung et al 2006;Nilsson et al 2002;Wickliffe et al 2000;Xu et al 2006). We employed g f −values determined by these laboratory efforts.…”
Section: Line Selection and Atomic Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Branching fraction uncertainties are combined in quadrature with lifetime uncertainties to determine the transition-probability uncertainties in Table 2. The procedure for determining branching fraction uncertainties is described in detail by Wickli †e, Lawler, & Nave (2000). Branching fractions from a given upper level are deÐned to sum to unity ; thus, a dominant line from an upper level has a small branching fraction uncertainty almost by deÐnition.…”
Section: Branching Fraction Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Systematic uncertainties in the radiometric calibration are typically the most serious source of uncertainty for widely separated lines from a common upper level. Wickli †e et al (2000) tested the formula used to estimate this radiometric calibration uncertainty by comparing a large set of branching fraction measurements, covering a factor of 6 in wavelength, with an independent set of measurements. The independent measurements were made by a di †erent researcher (at NIST) using a di †erent spectrometer and a di †erent calibration technique.…”
Section: Branching Fraction Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%