Handbook of Adult Development 2002
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-0617-1_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attachment Theory and Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our central assumption is that the security or insecurity of attachment will influence how life events are perceived (i.e., as threatening or not threatening) and thus whether or not the attachment system will be activated. We therefore argue that Bowlby's (1973Bowlby's ( , 1982 theoretical notion of internal working models as they influence attachment styles can be extended to views about significant life roles and one's relationships to such roles (see Bretherton & Munholland, 1999;Kenny & Barton, 2003). Moreover, we argue that one's identity as a parent or worker may be linked to the "self" aspect of one's internal working model.…”
Section: Rationale For the Present Studymentioning
confidence: 83%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Our central assumption is that the security or insecurity of attachment will influence how life events are perceived (i.e., as threatening or not threatening) and thus whether or not the attachment system will be activated. We therefore argue that Bowlby's (1973Bowlby's ( , 1982 theoretical notion of internal working models as they influence attachment styles can be extended to views about significant life roles and one's relationships to such roles (see Bretherton & Munholland, 1999;Kenny & Barton, 2003). Moreover, we argue that one's identity as a parent or worker may be linked to the "self" aspect of one's internal working model.…”
Section: Rationale For the Present Studymentioning
confidence: 83%
“…In contrast, Bartholomew (1990) and Bartholomew and Horowitz (1991) partially redefined attachment style to include two categories of avoidant individuals, fearful and dismissive, on the basis of both self-report data [(Relationship Questionnaire (RQ), Relationship Scales Questionnaire (RSQ)] and coded interviews, creating a four group taxonomy (positive-negative, self-other) of attachment style (see Kenny & Barton, 2003). Main and Goldwyn (1985) developed the Adult Attachment Interview (AAI) to assess attachment style security, wherein adults are placed into one of three attachment style groups based on their ability to recall early parental attachment relationships.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations