2016
DOI: 10.21037/atm.2016.12.11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attempting to define and refine vasopressin use in septic shock: the VANISH trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Vasopressin was under scrutiny for its potential effect on reducing the risk of acute kidney injury progression in septic patients, which was sparked by post hoc analysis of the VAST trial [ 83 ]. Results of the VANISH trial did not confirm such a hypothesis; however, because the study design was probably underpowered, further discussion on this subject is warranted [ 84 , 85 ]. It is important because COVID-19 patients have a risk of AKI reaching 22.2–36.6% [ 10 , 86 ].…”
Section: Pharmacotherapy – Vasopressorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vasopressin was under scrutiny for its potential effect on reducing the risk of acute kidney injury progression in septic patients, which was sparked by post hoc analysis of the VAST trial [ 83 ]. Results of the VANISH trial did not confirm such a hypothesis; however, because the study design was probably underpowered, further discussion on this subject is warranted [ 84 , 85 ]. It is important because COVID-19 patients have a risk of AKI reaching 22.2–36.6% [ 10 , 86 ].…”
Section: Pharmacotherapy – Vasopressorsmentioning
confidence: 99%