2017
DOI: 10.1002/ceas.12060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attending to Nuanced Emotions: Fostering Supervisees' Emotional Awareness and Complexity

Abstract: There is limited supervision research exploring how supervisees learn emotional awareness and complexity. In this article, the 5 levels of emotional awareness and 3 aspects of emotional complexity are explored in light of the supervision enterprise. In addition, 2 supervision intervention guides and a case example are provided.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there is wide acknowledgment that supervision can be an affectively activating process (Brown, 2010; Cooks & Ciesla, 2019; Klein & Robinson, 2018)—and that supervisee feelings may be indicative of salient developmental, temperamental, and clinical variables related to the supervisee, the client, the supervisor, the alliance, and/or the process—the basis for these conceptualizations has been primarily theoretical (Bernard & Goodyear, 2014). Increasing supervisees' emotional awareness and complexity is an important supervisory goal (Tangen, 2017). The FESS may provide a tool for supervisors both to gain knowledge of their supervisees' affective responses to feedback and to create here‐and‐now opportunities (through in‐session discussion and processing) for supervisee growth related to emotional self‐awareness, complexity, and regulation, as recommended by previous scholars (Prikhidko & Swank, 2018; Tangen, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although there is wide acknowledgment that supervision can be an affectively activating process (Brown, 2010; Cooks & Ciesla, 2019; Klein & Robinson, 2018)—and that supervisee feelings may be indicative of salient developmental, temperamental, and clinical variables related to the supervisee, the client, the supervisor, the alliance, and/or the process—the basis for these conceptualizations has been primarily theoretical (Bernard & Goodyear, 2014). Increasing supervisees' emotional awareness and complexity is an important supervisory goal (Tangen, 2017). The FESS may provide a tool for supervisors both to gain knowledge of their supervisees' affective responses to feedback and to create here‐and‐now opportunities (through in‐session discussion and processing) for supervisee growth related to emotional self‐awareness, complexity, and regulation, as recommended by previous scholars (Prikhidko & Swank, 2018; Tangen, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing supervisees' emotional awareness and complexity is an important supervisory goal (Tangen, 2017). The FESS may provide a tool for supervisors both to gain knowledge of their supervisees' affective responses to feedback and to create here‐and‐now opportunities (through in‐session discussion and processing) for supervisee growth related to emotional self‐awareness, complexity, and regulation, as recommended by previous scholars (Prikhidko & Swank, 2018; Tangen, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Researchers have examined the relationship between cognitive and emotional phenomena, social functions of emotions, mood, and ER with clients (D'Agostino, Covanti, Rossi Monti, & Starcevic, 2017; Gross, 2015; Hofmann, 2014; Linehan, 2015; Phelps, 2006). Additionally, scholars have focused on four areas of research with counselors and CITs: (a) emotional intelligence (Easton, Martin, & Wilson, 2008; Gutierrez, Mullen, & Fox, 2017; Olry‐Louis, 2018), (b) affective experiences (Melton et al, 2005), (c) emotional awareness (Skovholt & R⊘nnestad, 2003; Tangen, 2017), and (d) emotion‐focused coping (Pow & Cashwell, 2017). However, researchers have not focused on the integration of ER development within the counselor training process.…”
Section: Er Knowledge and Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The focus on developmental perspectives in counseling and counselor education has led researchers to design various pedagogical and supervisory practices that enhance cognitive development (Glosoff, Durham, & Whittaker, ; Owen & Lindley, ; Tangen, ; Welfare & Borders, ). In particular, the notion of cognitive complexity as “the ability to absorb, integrate, and make use of multiple perspectives” (Granello, , p. 92) has been closely examined in recent decades as a means to promote counselor development (Castillo, ; Little, Packman, Smaby, & Maddux, ; Owen & Lindley, ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%