2013
DOI: 10.1017/s0033291713001153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and executive functioning in affected and unaffected adolescents and their parents: challenging the endophenotype construct

Abstract: The core EFs proposed to be aetiologically related to ADHD, that is working memory and inhibition, seem to be aetiologically independent of ADHD in adolescence. EF deficits documented in childhood in unaffected siblings were no longer present in adolescence, suggesting that children 'grow out' of early EF deficits. This is the first study to document ADHD and EF in a large family sample with adolescent offspring. The results suggest that, after childhood, the majority of influences on ADHD are independent from… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
14
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
2
14
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For all domains, moderation analyses revealed differences between controls and unaffected siblings were large and pronounced in younger children (when taking into account age moderation, Cohen’s d ranged .49 to 1.1), but markedly smaller and largely absent in older youth ( d s for older youth ranged from −.09 to .17). This supports the claim by Thissen et al (2014) that endophenotype effects may wane in adolescence. There are several potential explanations for this finding.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For all domains, moderation analyses revealed differences between controls and unaffected siblings were large and pronounced in younger children (when taking into account age moderation, Cohen’s d ranged .49 to 1.1), but markedly smaller and largely absent in older youth ( d s for older youth ranged from −.09 to .17). This supports the claim by Thissen et al (2014) that endophenotype effects may wane in adolescence. There are several potential explanations for this finding.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Non-linear maturation during adolescence of prefrontal circuitry as well as subcortical and cerebellar regions implicated in ADHD may modulate the extent to which different cognitive domains are impaired among unaffected siblings or correlate with ADHD. Indeed, recent work has suggested that impairments documented among unaffected siblings of ADHD probands during childhood may not persist into adolescence (Thissen et al, 2014). Additionally, sex differences in the association between various neuropsychological measures and ADHD have been reported among probands (Bidwell et al, 2007; Martel, 2013; O’Brien, Dowell, Mostofsky, Denckla, & Mahone, 2010) but few studies have formally examined moderation of endophenotype effects by either proband sex or by individual sex.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the maturation of the corresponding brain circuitry, specific developmental trajectories are assumed (Castellanos and Tannock, 2002;Doyle et al, 2005;Durston et al, 2011;Nigg et al, 2004;Thissen et al, 2014). Within this context, the question has sometimes been raised of whether specific developmental periods of the basic deficits may be more or less suitable for assessment (Pauli-Pott and Becker, 2011;Rommelse et al, 2011;Thissen et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, in a large‐scale study in adolescents, Thissen et al. () found no difference between unaffected relatives and controls. To estimate the mean effect size of the difference between unaffected relatives and controls in IC, we conducted a meta‐analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“… The following articles ( d : standardized difference in means) were included: Thissen et al. (): d = −0.02; Banaschewski et al. (): d = 0.61, Kuntsi et al.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%