1999
DOI: 10.1177/070674379904401007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in Children and Youth: A Quantitative Systematic Review of the Efficacy of Different Management Strategies

Abstract: Though stimulant medications were found to be an effective treatment strategy for ADHD in children and youth, it proved difficult to assess the relative benefits of behavioural interventions alone and combined medication and behavioural therapy because of the paucity of treatment studies other than medication-only treatment studies and heterogeneity of various kinds that exist in relation to ADHD studies and treatments.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We test ed for a sig nif i cant differ ence in mar gin al WTP val ues in each group of stu dents, name ly, in the ab solute dif fer ence (ab s d iff) be tween WTP for stan dard drug 1 and WTP for new drug 2, and that be tween WTP for new drug 1 and WTP for stan dard drug 2 : WTP stan dard drug 1 −WTP new drug 2 =ab s d iff 1 , WTP new drug 1 −WTP stan dard drug 2 = ab s d iff 2 . The dif fer ence be tween ab s d iff 1 and ab s d iff 2 was found to be very small (€26.28 vs. €25.65, P=0.946, in de pen dentsam ples t test; . Ta ble 2); mar gin al WTP was thus ap prox i mate ly the same for the two groups of re spon dents.…”
Section: De Scrip Tive Sta Tis Tics and Test Re Sults In Group 1 (Stamentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We test ed for a sig nif i cant differ ence in mar gin al WTP val ues in each group of stu dents, name ly, in the ab solute dif fer ence (ab s d iff) be tween WTP for stan dard drug 1 and WTP for new drug 2, and that be tween WTP for new drug 1 and WTP for stan dard drug 2 : WTP stan dard drug 1 −WTP new drug 2 =ab s d iff 1 , WTP new drug 1 −WTP stan dard drug 2 = ab s d iff 2 . The dif fer ence be tween ab s d iff 1 and ab s d iff 2 was found to be very small (€26.28 vs. €25.65, P=0.946, in de pen dentsam ples t test; . Ta ble 2); mar gin al WTP was thus ap prox i mate ly the same for the two groups of re spon dents.…”
Section: De Scrip Tive Sta Tis Tics and Test Re Sults In Group 1 (Stamentioning
confidence: 91%
“…It is es ti mat ed to oc cur in 3-5 of the school-aged pop u la tion [1,2]. The dis order has three prin ci pal fea tures: dif fi cul ty in con cen trat ing for long pe ri ods of time (inat ten tion), ex ces sive move ment (hy perac tiv i ty), and act ing with out think ing (impul sive ness) [2].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[52][53][54][55][56] Most of the studies comparing short and long-acting methylphenidate compounds found no significant differences in effect sizes. 55,57 However, a meta-analysis looking at medications for adults with ADHD found that the clinical response for short-acting stimulants was greater than for long-acting stimulants.…”
Section: Efficacy Of Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 Short-term trials of stimulants support their efficacy, with response rates in the 70%-to-90% range. 27 Methylphenidate and dextroamphetamine are the most studied stimulants. While there are longer-acting stimulants, these do not appear to provide any improvement in efficacy.…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%