1967
DOI: 10.3758/bf03328553
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attention distribution as a function of novelty and familiarity

Abstract: Experimentally defined novelty and familiarity was shown to influence the distribution of attention to visual stimuli in the 42-month-old child. Familiarity produced response decrement while novelty resulted in response recovery. Further, attentive behavior was maintained for approximately 30 min. by varying the environmental input.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

1968
1968
1969
1969

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The decrement data for both the fixation and smiling responses confirm the earlier results reported by Lewis, Goldberg and Rausch (1967) and Lewis and Goldberg (1969), These data indicate that response decrement as a function of stimulus repetition follows the form of a negative exponential curve. Growing experimental evidence (Lewis, 1967;Razran, 1961) indicates that the rate of this decrement is related to cognitive variables.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The decrement data for both the fixation and smiling responses confirm the earlier results reported by Lewis, Goldberg and Rausch (1967) and Lewis and Goldberg (1969), These data indicate that response decrement as a function of stimulus repetition follows the form of a negative exponential curve. Growing experimental evidence (Lewis, 1967;Razran, 1961) indicates that the rate of this decrement is related to cognitive variables.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Growing experimental evidence (Lewis, 1967;Razran, 1961) indicates that the rate of this decrement is related to cognitive variables. Stimulus change following stimulus repetition produces an orienting reflex, and the magnitude of the OR varies with the nature of the stimulus change.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is known, for example, that the OR is affected by changes in terms of intensity (Bernstein, 196,;Zimmy & Schwabe, 1965). Results reported by Lewis, -2- Goldberg, and Rausch (1967) suggest that factors independent of intensity, such as color and content changes, can influence the magnitude of the OR.…”
Section: The Magnitude Of the Orienting Response In Children As A Funmentioning
confidence: 94%