2017
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-016-1216-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attention flexibly trades off across points in time

Abstract: Sensory signals continuously enter the brain, raising the question of how perceptual systems handle this constant flow of input. Attention to an anticipated point in time can prioritize visual information at that time. However, how we voluntarily attend across time when there are successive task-relevant stimuli has been barely investigated. We developed a novel experimental protocol that allowed us to assess, for the first time, both the benefits and costs of voluntary temporal attention when perceiving a sho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

15
136
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
15
136
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, delayed responses were less efficient for low predictability trials when the duration of the delay interval was highly variable. These results were consistent with the finding of a recent behavioural study in which cueing participants to a point in time can lead to perceptual improvements at expected time points but impairments at unexpected time points (Denison, Heeger, & Carrasco, 2017). We suggest that the duration of delay interval in our study may serve as a temporal cue and establish expectations about the occurrence of the test probe.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Conversely, delayed responses were less efficient for low predictability trials when the duration of the delay interval was highly variable. These results were consistent with the finding of a recent behavioural study in which cueing participants to a point in time can lead to perceptual improvements at expected time points but impairments at unexpected time points (Denison, Heeger, & Carrasco, 2017). We suggest that the duration of delay interval in our study may serve as a temporal cue and establish expectations about the occurrence of the test probe.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The observers were the same as in Denison et al (2017) Stimuli were generated on an Apple iMac using Matlab and Psychophysics Toolbox (Brainard,122 1997; Pelli, 1997;Kleiner et al, 2007). They were displayed on a gamma-corrected Sony 123…”
Section: Observers 108mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Voluntarily directing attention to a relevant time increases perceptual sensitivity at that time 38 (Correa et Denison et al, 2017) and decreases sensitivity at other times, resulting in attentional tradeoffs 40 . The mechanisms underlying the allocation and perceptual effects of 41 voluntary temporal attention remain poorly understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a case study, here we analyzed data for a study on temporal attention -the prioritization of 117 sensory information at specific points in time (Denison, Heeger, & Carrasco, 2017). Combining 118 information about the expected timing of sensory events with ongoing task goals improves our 119 perception and behavior (review by Nobre & van Ede, 2018).…”
Section: Introduction 21mentioning
confidence: 99%