2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.02.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attention modulates event-related spectral power in multisensory self-motion perception

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One interesting characteristic of a visual optic flow stimulus is that it can produce a significant self-motion or a vection effect when separated from the inertial stimulus (62)(63)(64)(65)(66)(67), and this visually induced effect was then perceived as inertial motion itself. There is evidence of shared neurophysiology for visual and vestibular processing that is used to determine our motion through a fixed environment (68)(69)(70). The reason for this is that the vestibular organs sense only acceleration, so if motion continues at a constant linear velocity, there is no acceleration and thus no vestibular stimulus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One interesting characteristic of a visual optic flow stimulus is that it can produce a significant self-motion or a vection effect when separated from the inertial stimulus (62)(63)(64)(65)(66)(67), and this visually induced effect was then perceived as inertial motion itself. There is evidence of shared neurophysiology for visual and vestibular processing that is used to determine our motion through a fixed environment (68)(69)(70). The reason for this is that the vestibular organs sense only acceleration, so if motion continues at a constant linear velocity, there is no acceleration and thus no vestibular stimulus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the subject was asked only to report the inertial stimulus direction. Thus, they may not have truly been integrating the visual-inertial stimuli, and the neurophysiology seems to be different when subjects are asked to attend to only one modality (70). However, the strong bias of inertial heading perception toward the visual direction at most but not all timing delays tested suggests the timing delay was not ignored.…”
Section: Visual-inertial Offsetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these results did not show this trend. These results are discussed in terms of the process of real cursor identification from the perspective of visual search research.Past visual search tasks have shown that when searching for multiple objects, the dominance of serial and parallel processes varies from situation to situation [27][28][29] and that it is difficult to group multiple objects 30 . Furthermore, it has been reported that attention resources are limited only in the case of spatial configuration search 31,32 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the time-frequency domain, Pfurtscheller et al (1994) and Klimesch et al (1990), Klimesch (1999) firstly, followed by others (Gomarus et al 2006, Rektor et al 2006, Wiesman et al 2017, Proskovec et al 2018, Townsend et al 2019 investigated different oscillatory modulation in different frequency bands during various visual cognitive tasks using event related desynchronizations/ synchronizations (ERD/ERS) analysis. They reported task-demand modulated ERD in alpha band during visual information processing, memorization tasks and attention allocation as well as beta band ERD, coupling with the alpha band ones, during processing of a visual cue and the preparation and execution of a motor action.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%