2007
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.4.645
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attentional control and the relatedness proportion effect in semantic priming.

Abstract: In 2 experiments, participants completed both an attentional control battery (OSPAN, antisaccade, and Stroop tasks) and a modified semantic priming task. The priming task measured relatedness proportion (RP) effects within subjects, with the color of the prime indicating the probability that the to-be-named target would be related. In Experiment 2, participants were cued before each trial with the probability of a related target. Stimulus onset asynchronies traditionally thought to tap automatic processing (26… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

20
190
4
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(215 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
(125 reference statements)
20
190
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Full results are presented in Table 3, and priming effects are illustrated in . This finding replicates previous findings of a RP effect on semantic priming (e.g., Hutchison, 2007;.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Full results are presented in Table 3, and priming effects are illustrated in . This finding replicates previous findings of a RP effect on semantic priming (e.g., Hutchison, 2007;.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This RP modulation corroborates prior demonstrations that semantic priming is under strategic control (Hutchison, 2007;Neely et al, Integrative Priming 26 1989), and suggests that the lack of RP modulation in Experiment 3A was not due to spurious methodological factors. Full results are presented in Table 3, and priming effects are illustrated in .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…More concretely, the complete lack of a load effect on FA priming seems to be at odds with findings from Hutchison andcolleagues (2014, see also Hutchison, 2007). They found a significant positive correlation between attentional control and FA priming, meaning that people performing well on attentional control tasks (i.e., OSPAN, antisaccade, and Stroop) showed larger priming effects for FA pairs.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 47%
“…On the other hand, the experimental manipulation may have (partly) missed the mark. Attentional control, as captured by Hutchison andcolleagues (2007, 2014), likely involves many abilities including verbal fluency, inhibition of distraction, and attention shifting, which could all be responsible for the observed relation with FA priming. As such, the narrower, non-verbal nature of the dot memory task may not (sufficiently) constrain the processes involved in the standard lexical decision priming paradigm, thus producing divergent results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dentre os estudos dos efeitos de priming semântico encontrados na literatura, a maioria deles tem sido realizada com adultos (Basnight-Brown & Altarriba, 2007;Brown & Besner, 2002;Brown, Roberts, & Besner, 2001;Coney, 2002;Davenport & Potter, 2005;Friedrich, Henik, & Tzelgov, 1991;Frost & Bentin, 1992;Hutchison, 2007;Lukatela & Turvey, 1991;McNamara, 1994;Nievas & Justicia, 2004;Nobre & McCarthy, 1995;Perea & Gotor, 1997;Perea & Rosa, 2002;Reimer, Brow, & Lorsbach, 2001;Valdés, Catena, & Marí-Beffa, 2005). Nos poucos estudos realizados com crianças/adolescentes tem sido encontrado efeito de priming semântico (Assink, Bergen, Teeseling, & Knuijt, 2004;Barry, 2007;Hala, Pexman, & Glenwright, 2007;Nievas & Justicia, 2004;Schvaneveldt, Ackerman, & Semlear, 1977;Schwantes, Boesl, & Ritz, 1980;Simpson & Forster, 1986;Simpson & Lorsbach, 1983, 1987 em amostras de algumas idades/séries e sob determinadas condições.…”
unclassified