2019 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/bibm47256.2019.8983125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AttentionDTA: prediction of drug–target binding affinity using attention model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
75
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With regard to the DAVIS dataset, it can be observed that the greater number of the scores are found in the range of [5,6] along the x-axis, principally because the score of 5 establishes more than half of the dataset. Additionally, there is a crowded area of KIBA scores lying in the range [11,14] along the x-axis, which shows similar behavior to the Davis dataset. Principally, for both datasets, the data instances are close to the red regression line which, in turn, demonstrates that the proposed architecture has a competitive prediction performance.…”
Section: Results and Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…With regard to the DAVIS dataset, it can be observed that the greater number of the scores are found in the range of [5,6] along the x-axis, principally because the score of 5 establishes more than half of the dataset. Additionally, there is a crowded area of KIBA scores lying in the range [11,14] along the x-axis, which shows similar behavior to the Davis dataset. Principally, for both datasets, the data instances are close to the red regression line which, in turn, demonstrates that the proposed architecture has a competitive prediction performance.…”
Section: Results and Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Among these approaches, Attention-DTA and MT-DTI yielded best results with CI of 0.887, MSE of 0.245 on the Davis dataset; also, on the KIBA dataset, they both achieved CI of 0.882 and MSE of 0.220 and 0.162 respectively. This explains the effectiveness of the attention convolutional operation in learning sequential drug and target information in the case of Attention-DTA [14]; and also, the efficiency of the pre-trained BERT representation presented in MT-DTI.…”
Section: Results and Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Gao et al [17] combined Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) to obtain meaningful information from protein sequences and drug structures. Zhao et al [18] proposed an end-to-end model, associated with an attention mechanism, to predict the binding affinity of DTIs. Zhao et al [19] proposed a neural network, GANsDTA, which combined two Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) and a regression network to predict binding affinity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%