2001 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (Cat. No.01CH37310)
DOI: 10.1109/nssmic.2001.1008627
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attenuation correction using SPECT emission data only

Abstract: A major step towards quantitative SPECT imaging may be achieved if attenuation, scatter and blurring effects are accounted for in the reconstruction process. Here we consider an approach which simultaneously estimates the unknown attenuation coefficient and the emission source using the emission data only. This leads to an inverse mathematical problem which could no longer be solved via iterative procedures like the well-known EM-algorithm. Instead, a regularization approach based on nonlinear optimization tec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
12
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…V. Dicken in [16] formulated this problem as an optimization problem and solved it via nonlinear Tikhonov regularization techniques. More information and references about simultaneous reconstruction of the unknown emission and attenuation maps can be found in [8,18,48,43,50]. But a satisfactory method for determining both unknown functions from the emission data has not yet been found.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…V. Dicken in [16] formulated this problem as an optimization problem and solved it via nonlinear Tikhonov regularization techniques. More information and references about simultaneous reconstruction of the unknown emission and attenuation maps can be found in [8,18,48,43,50]. But a satisfactory method for determining both unknown functions from the emission data has not yet been found.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first class of algorithms attempt to estimate the attenuation coefficients directly from the emission data. These algorithms either try to perform iterative inversion of the forward mathematical model, 1619 or exploit the consistency conditions that are based on the forward model. 15, 2022 However, these methods are considerably slow, and mostly use only the data around the photopeak events neglecting the scattered photons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been much previous work on estimating attenuation from emission projection data, e.g., [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24]. However, the task undertaken here differs from the tasks pursued in previous studies in a major way.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%