2012
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m112.371062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attenuation of T Cell Receptor Signaling by Serine Phosphorylation-mediated Lysine 30 Ubiquitination of SLP-76 Protein

Abstract: Background: SLP-76 is negatively regulated by Ser-376 phosphorylation through unclear mechanisms. Results: Ser-376 phosphorylation induces SLP-76 ubiquitination at Lys-30, leading to degradation of activated SLP-76 and subsequent attenuation of T cell receptor (TCR) signaling. Conclusion: Ser-376 phosphorylation attenuates TCR signaling by inducing ubiquitination and degradation of activated SLP-76. Significance: This is the first report of SLP-76 ubiquitination initiated by Ser-376 phosphorylation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
39
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the interaction between SLP-76 and ADAP may simply enhance the overall avidity of the interactions that maintain SLP-76 microclusters. Second, in the absence of ADAP, the serinethreonine kinase HPK1 may gain increased access to microclusters, which it may destabilize by promoting the ubiquitylation and degradation of SLP-76 and Gads (di Bartolo et al, 2007;Shui et al, 2007;Patzak et al, 2010;Lasserre et al, 2011;Wang et al, 2012;Coussens et al, 2013). Third, ADAP may contribute to the exclusion or inactivation of the Cbl family E3 ubiquitin ligases, which promote the degradation of LAT, SLP-76, Vav1 and WASP, and attenuate microcluster lifetimes (Krawczyk et al, 2000;Miura-Shimura et al, 2003;Chiang et al, 2004;Barr et al, 2006;Balagopalan et al, 2007Balagopalan et al, , 2011Chiang et al, 2009;Chiang and Hodes, 2011;Reicher et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the interaction between SLP-76 and ADAP may simply enhance the overall avidity of the interactions that maintain SLP-76 microclusters. Second, in the absence of ADAP, the serinethreonine kinase HPK1 may gain increased access to microclusters, which it may destabilize by promoting the ubiquitylation and degradation of SLP-76 and Gads (di Bartolo et al, 2007;Shui et al, 2007;Patzak et al, 2010;Lasserre et al, 2011;Wang et al, 2012;Coussens et al, 2013). Third, ADAP may contribute to the exclusion or inactivation of the Cbl family E3 ubiquitin ligases, which promote the degradation of LAT, SLP-76, Vav1 and WASP, and attenuate microcluster lifetimes (Krawczyk et al, 2000;Miura-Shimura et al, 2003;Chiang et al, 2004;Barr et al, 2006;Balagopalan et al, 2007Balagopalan et al, , 2011Chiang et al, 2009;Chiang and Hodes, 2011;Reicher et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This downregulation is due to the inactivation of NF-B, which binds to the Btk promoter and induces transcription of Btk (56). Moreover, it has been reported that 14-3-3 binding can stimulate ubiquitination, resulting in degradation of its partner proteins, such as SLP-76 and Mdmx (57,58). Interestingly, BLNK, also known as SLP-65, which in B cells has a function related to that of SLP-76 in T cells, is also regulated by 14-3-3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…51 In T cells, SLP-76 is phosphorylated by HPK1, leading to binding of 14-3-3, ubiquitination, and degradation of SLP-76 with subsequent attenuation of TCR signaling. [45][46][47]52 Moreover, HPK1 competes with ADAP for SLP-76 binding in T cells and thereby decreases the amount of active Rap1, an activator of highaffinity LFA-1. 25 In PMNs, SLP-76 is involved in integrin activation, as well as in outside-in signaling and subsequent cell spreading.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%