Attenuation Relationships of Ground Motion Intensity Using Short Period Level as a Variable

Kataoka, Shojiro; Satoh, Toshimi; Matsumoto, Sayuri; Kusakabe, Takaaki

doi:10.2208/jsceja.62.740

Cited by 23 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The feature of Eq. (4) is similar to the empirical equations by Kataoka et al (2006). The difference between Eq.…”

Section: Revised Equations For Acceleration Response Spectrasupporting

confidence: 64%

“…Outer-rise earthquakes off Kii peninsula (Seno 2005) are included as intraplate earthquakes. The A of the intraplate earthquakes are larger than A of the interplate earthquakes as pointed out by several researchers (e.g., Satoh 2006;Kataoka et al 2006;Sasatani et al 2006). The regression equation derived assuming that the A is proportional to M 0 1/3 is Eq.(3).…”

Section: Revised Equations For Acceleration Response Spectramentioning

confidence: 82%

“…In order to investigate the cause of the difference, the relation between M 0 and the short-period spectral level A of 31 earthquakes used for the revised equations is shown in Figure 8. The A is the flat level of the acceleration source spectra estimated by the spectral inversion method (Kataoka et al 2006;Satoh 2006Satoh , 2009Satoh , 2010bSatoh , 2012. Outer-rise earthquakes off Kii peninsula (Seno 2005) are included as intraplate earthquakes.…”

Section: Revised Equations For Acceleration Response Spectramentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Revisions of Empirical Ground Motion Models and the Simulations of Long-Period Strong Motions of the 2011 Off the Pacific Coast of Tohoku Earthquake

Satoh¹,

Okawa

Nishikawa

et al. 2014

Journal of JAEE

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We revise the empirical relations for acceleration response spectra and average and variance of group delay time of long-period ground motions. The M W 2 term is added in the revised relation for response spectra. In addition the differences between the Pacific plate earthquakes and the Philippine Sea plate earthquakes are considered into their attenuation and the site coefficients. We set the three-connected source model composed of three outer-faults based on strong motion generation areas of the Tohoku earthquake. Finally we show that the long-period strong motions of the Tohoku earthquake are reasonably simulated well using the revised attenuation relations and the three-connected source model.

show abstract

“…The feature of Eq. (4) is similar to the empirical equations by Kataoka et al (2006). The difference between Eq.…”

Section: Revised Equations For Acceleration Response Spectrasupporting

confidence: 64%

Section: Revised Equations For Acceleration Response Spectramentioning

confidence: 82%

Section: Revised Equations For Acceleration Response Spectramentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Revisions of Empirical Ground Motion Models and the Simulations of Long-Period Strong Motions of the 2011 Off the Pacific Coast of Tohoku Earthquake

Satoh¹,

Okawa

Nishikawa

et al. 2014

Journal of JAEE

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In assessing seismic hazard of the earthquake scenarios, regional ground motion prediction equations (e.g. Kataoka et al 2006), along with appropriate site amplifi cation factors can be employed. To derive the event-based seismic hazard curve, the identifi ed major scenarios are sorted in a descending order in terms of expected seismic intensity measure.…”

Section: Seismic Event Risk Curve Based On Multi-event Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The seismic hazard information is characterized by the multi-event model (see Section 27.2.2). For given scenarios, ground motion parameters were estimated based on the equation by Kataoka et al (2006); the parameter in this case study was the acceleration response spectrum for natural period corresponding to 5% damping ratio at engineering bedrock surface. The logarithmic standard deviation of this prediction equation is 0.45 in the natural logarithmic scale.…”

Section: Reinforced Concrete Piers Of a Highway Bridgementioning

confidence: 99%

Seismic risk and possible maximum loss (PML) analysis of reinforced concrete structures

Yoshikawa

2013

Handbook of Seismic Risk Analysis and Management of Civil Infrastructure Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A ground motion prediction equation for JMA instrumental seismic intensity for shallow crustal earthquakes in active tectonic regimes

Campbell¹,

Bozorgnia

2010

Earthq Engng Struct Dyn

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The JMA (Japan Meteorological Agency) seismic intensity scale has been used in Japan as a measure of earthquake ground shaking effects since 1949. It has traditionally been assessed after an earthquake based on the judgment of JMA officials. In 1996 the scale was revised as an instrumental seismic intensity measure (IJMA) that could be used to rapidly assess the expected damage after an earthquake without having to conduct a survey. Since its revision, Japanese researchers have developed several ground motion prediction equations (GMPEs) for IJMA using Japanese ground motion data. In this paper, we develop a new empirical GMPE for IJMA based on the strong motion database and functional forms used to develop similar GMPEs for peak response parameters as part of the PEER (Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center) Next Generation Attenuation (NGA) project. We consider this relationship to be valid for shallow crustal earthquakes in active tectonic regimes for moment magnitudes (M) ranging from 5.0 up to 7.5–8.5 (depending on fault mechanism) and rupture distances ranging from 0 to 200 km. A comparison of this GMPE with relationships developed by Japanese researchers for crustal and shallow subduction earthquakes shows relatively good agreement among all of the relationships at M 7.0 but relatively poor agreement at small magnitudes. Our GMPE predicts the highest intensities at small magnitudes, which together with research on other ground motion parameters, indicates that it provides conservative or upwardly biased estimates of IJMA for M<5.5. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

show abstract

Attenuation Relationships of Ground Motion Intensity Using Short Period Level as a Variable

Cited by 23 publications

References 25 publications

Revisions of Empirical Ground Motion Models and the Simulations of Long-Period Strong Motions of the 2011 Off the Pacific Coast of Tohoku Earthquake

Revisions of Empirical Ground Motion Models and the Simulations of Long-Period Strong Motions of the 2011 Off the Pacific Coast of Tohoku Earthquake

Seismic risk and possible maximum loss (PML) analysis of reinforced concrete structures

A ground motion prediction equation for JMA instrumental seismic intensity for shallow crustal earthquakes in active tectonic regimes

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About