Attitude of Korean Primary Care Family Physicians Towards Telehealth

Abstract

BackgroundRecently, a revised telehealth legislation that allows direct doctor to patient teleconsultation was proposed in Korea. However, there have been some debates. This study aimed to examine the attitude of primary care physicians towards telehealth.MethodsA questionnaire asking attitude towards telehealth and revised telehealth legislation was self-administered to 1,988 registered members of Practitioners Council of Korean Academy of Family Medicine. A total of 218 complete responses by family physicians were included in the study.ResultsLarge proportion (60.6%) of participants disagreed to the main clause of revised telehealth legislation, which allowed doctor to patient teleconsultation. Participants tended to expect that negative outcomes are more likely to occur than positive outcomes after the enforcement of the revised telehealth legislation. Around 50% of participants had an intention to adopt telehealth just as soon (4.6%) or afterwards (45.4%). The majority of participants suggested that; primary care clinic as the most appropriate telehealth facility (75.4%); patients with low accessibility to medical care (74.3%) as the best target of telehealth service; and tele-radiology (61.9%) or tele-pathology (41.3%) as the most applicable medical field for telehealh service. Around 89% of participants suggested telehealth service fee to be similar or higher than current medical consultation fee.ConclusionThe majority of family physicians participating in this study were not in favor of the revised telehealth legislation. However, the majority of the participants had an intention to adopt telehealth to their practice and held clear opinion about practical aspects of telehealth.

Understanding Clinicians’ Adoption of Mobile Health Tools: A Qualitative Review of the Most Used Frameworks

“…Workflow fit, which indicates how the tool would fit into and improve the day-to-day work of clinical staff, is another specific factor that was not defined as a distinct construct in most frameworks used, although it was mentioned in 12 studies [ 39 , 44 , 46 , 49 , 52 , 60 , 77 , 84 , 86 ]. Similarly, changes to clinical practices were specifically reported in nine studies, indicating that mHealth adoption sometimes required some process changes and adaptation to clinical practice, and this may hinder adoption if not addressed properly [ 15 , 41 , 45 , 49 , 53 , 71 , 77 , 87 ].…”

Reimagining Radiology: A Comprehensive Overview of Reviews at the Intersection of Mobile and Domiciliary Radiology over the Last Five Years

“…The topics covered in these studies include: the examinations of teleradiology practices in Turkey [ 44 ], the perceptions of clinical medical students towards radiology careers in Ghana [ 45 ], patient-reported outcomes after fracture treatment in primary healthcare [ 46 ], usability and efficiency evaluations of an application in orthopedics [ 47 ], the socio-economic and psychological impacts of the COVID-19 outbreak on radiologists [ 48 ], work-style reform and technology utilization among diagnostic radiologists in Japan [ 49 ], skepticism about artificial intelligence in the radiology field [ 50 ], patient satisfaction with teleradiology services in Italy [ 51 ], patient satisfaction with teleradiology services in general practice [ 52 ], on-call service of neurosurgeons in Germany [ 53 ], attitudes of Korean primary care family physicians toward telehealth [ 54 ], Factors influencing clinician satisfaction with radiology services [ 55 ], and positive aspects found in healthcare information and communication technology implementation in Finland [ 56 ].…”

“…In light of the absence of the above-mentioned themes in these studies [ 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 ], it is recommended that researchers address these issues promptly .…”

On the use of telemedicine in the context of COVID-19: legal aspects and a systematic review of technology

“…However, the Ministry of Health and Welfare proposed a revision of the telehealth legislation in 2009. The revised telehealth legislation allows for direct teleconsultation between patient-doctor, receipt of the prescription, and forwarding of electronic prescription to the pharmacy (Kim et al 2011 ).…”