2021
DOI: 10.1177/1363461520909601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attitudes of key professionals towards people with intellectual disabilities and their inclusion in society: A qualitative study in an Indonesian context

Abstract: This study aimed to explore key professionals’ attitudes towards people with intellectual disability (ID) and inclusion of said people in the community. Eighteen participants from three professional groups, comprising health practitioners (medical doctors, psychologists), mainstream/special education teachers, and religious leaders (Islam, Catholicism, Protestantism, Hinduism, and Buddhism) were recruited. Semistructured interviews, aided by two vignettes depicting mild and severe ID, were conducted. Thematic … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…What stood out in this study, however, were two sentiments expressed by healthcare providers: one, the practitioners appeared to feel the necessity for separate spaces and specially trained staff, with a particular focus on how to interact with people with disabilities; and two, the need for "empathy" in order to provide quality primary care services to people with disabilities. The first sentiment is somewhat similar to the findings from Tri Handoyo et al (2021), who found that key professionals seemed less favorable to the inclusion of people with intellectual disabilities (IDs), particularly with severe IDs, in Indonesia [25]. While this approach may seem practical at first, it may result on segregation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…What stood out in this study, however, were two sentiments expressed by healthcare providers: one, the practitioners appeared to feel the necessity for separate spaces and specially trained staff, with a particular focus on how to interact with people with disabilities; and two, the need for "empathy" in order to provide quality primary care services to people with disabilities. The first sentiment is somewhat similar to the findings from Tri Handoyo et al (2021), who found that key professionals seemed less favorable to the inclusion of people with intellectual disabilities (IDs), particularly with severe IDs, in Indonesia [25]. While this approach may seem practical at first, it may result on segregation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…One factor is the extensive stigmatisation of children with disabilities or special educational needs in Indonesia (Handoyo et al 2018;Sheehy and Budiyanto 2014), a stigma which can also be applied to those who teach these children (Budiyanto, Kaye, and Rofiah 2020). Part of this stigmatisation is a belief that disabled children in kindergartens, in particular those with learning disabilities, will ' hinder the development of other normal children' (Anggia and Harun 2019, 181).…”
Section: Inclusive Indonesian Classrooms Projectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Qualitative approaches offer another way of exploring attitudes among these key stakeholders (see for example Tri Handoyo et al, 2021). While interviews, focus groups and other qualitative data collection methods are also open to social desirability bias, there are ways to minimise it (Bergen and Labonté, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%