Attitudes of Patients Toward Adoption of 3D Technology in Pain Assessment: Qualitative Perspective

Abstract

BackgroundPast research has revealed that insufficient pain assessment could, and often, has negative implications on the provision of quality health care. While current available clinical approaches have proven to be valid interventions, they are expensive and can often fail in providing efficient pain measurements. The increase in the prevalence of pain calls for more intuitive pain assessment solutions. Computerized alternatives have already been proposed both in the literature and in commerce, but may lack essential qualities such as accuracy of the collected clinical information and effective patient-clinician interaction. In response to this concern, 3-dimensional (3D) technology could become the innovative intervention needed to support and improve the pain assessment process.ObjectiveThe purpose of this analysis was to describe qualitative findings from a study which was designed to explore patients’ perceptions of adopting 3D technology in the assessment of their pain experience related to important themes that might positively or negatively influence the quality of the pain assessment process.MethodsThe perceptions of 60 individuals with some form of pain in the area of Greater London were collected through semi-structured interviews. Of the 60 respondents, 24 (43%) produced usable responses and were analyzed for content using principles of the grounded theory approach and thematic analysis, in order to gain insight into the participants’ beliefs and attitudes towards adopting 3D technology in pain assessment.ResultsThe analysis identified 4 high-level core themes that were representative of the participants’ responses. These themes indicated that most respondents valued “the potential of 3D technology to facilitate better assessment of pain” as the most useful outcome of adopting a 3D approach. Respondents also expressed their opinions on the usability of the 3D approach, with no important concerns reported about its perceived ease of use. Our findings finally, showed that respondents appreciated the perceived clinical utility of the proposed approach, which could further have an influence on their intention to use it.ConclusionsThese findings highlighted factors that are seen as essential for improving the assessment of pain, and demonstrated the need for a strong focus on patient-clinician communication. The participants of this analysis believed that the introduction of 3D technology in the process might be a useful mechanism for such a positive health care outcome. The study’s findings could also be used to make recommendations concerning the potential for inclusion of 3D technology in current clinical pain tools for the purpose of improving the quality of health care.

Users’ Opinion About a Virtual Reality System as an Adjunct to Psychological Treatment for Stress-Related Disorders: A Quantitative and Qualitative Mixed-Methods Study

“…Similar results were obtained in the treatment of panic disorder with or without agoraphobia ( Botella et al, 2007 ). In the case of the assessment and treatment of pain, patients have also shown high acceptance of the introduction of technology, and they have very positively appraised the use of technologies, highlighting that these tools could have a positive influence on the treatment outcomes ( Spyridonis et al, 2013 ). In the same way, preliminary data in patients who suffer from stress-related disorders indicate high levels of satisfaction with the use of VR ( Baños et al, 2009 ; Andreu-Mateu, 2011 ).…”

Feasibility and acceptability to use a smartphone-based manikin for daily longitudinal self-reporting of chronic pain

“… 38 , 68 For example, a more detailed, gender-specific manikin may enable women to better communicate their pain, 69 with potential for improving their health care and outcomes. 70 However, personalisation requirements may vary between people depending on their age, gender and ethnicity. This adds complexity of implementing such requirements into manikin software and warrants careful consideration of if and how such modifications impact the usability, reliability and validity of digital manikins as a pain measurement instrument.…”

Fall Prevention Self-Assessments Via Mobile 3D Visualization Technologies: Community Dwelling Older Adults’ Perceptions of Opportunities and Challenges

“…A 3D visualization of the environment is constructed, with the help of the robot, to assist clinicians in identifying the precise location and nature of extrinsic fall hazards. Examples in other areas of health care include the work of Spyridonis et al [ 34 ] who found that enabling patients to carry out self-assessments by reporting the type and precise location of back pain by using a 3D visualization of the human body was more accurate and intuitive than the traditional paper-based 2D model of the human body typically used in practice. Other studies have found similar benefits in utilizing 3D visualizations to communicate other forms of pain to clinicians.…”