2002
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6939-3-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attitudes of the Japanese public and doctors towards use of archived information and samples without informed consent: Preliminary findings based on focus group interviews

Abstract: Background: The purpose of this study is to explore laypersons' attitudes toward the use of archived (existing) materials such as medical records and biological samples and to compare them with the attitudes of physicians who are involved in medical research.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
62
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…i.e, limiting to oneself and not disclosing to others. [10][11][12][13][14] These findings were in agreement with the study done by Kaufman DJ 2009 and Hansson MG in 2011 15,16 which stated that the fundamental concern about privacy is usually also the main concern of the participants when they are deciding whether to donate their samples to Biobanks. Their study showed that up to 90% of people were concerned about their privacy Thus, concluded that consequences of breaking privacy could substantially affect public's willingness to participate and substantially delay the research.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…i.e, limiting to oneself and not disclosing to others. [10][11][12][13][14] These findings were in agreement with the study done by Kaufman DJ 2009 and Hansson MG in 2011 15,16 which stated that the fundamental concern about privacy is usually also the main concern of the participants when they are deciding whether to donate their samples to Biobanks. Their study showed that up to 90% of people were concerned about their privacy Thus, concluded that consequences of breaking privacy could substantially affect public's willingness to participate and substantially delay the research.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The concerns our respondents had were ''the confidentiality of personal information is protected'', ''how the research result is utilized and published'' and ''the possible revealing of an association between my DNA and ADRs''. The main concern in our study that ''the confidentiality of personal information is protected'' was also reported in previous studies in other countries and in Japan (Pulley et al 2008;Wong et al 2004;Hoeyer et al 2004;Asai et al 2002). Also, this was the main reason for the unwillingness to donate DNA samples in our study, ''I don't want my personal information to be utilized in research''.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…[17][18][19][20] In fact, numerous studies have found a positive correlation between level of trust and degree of participation not only in biobanking, but in research as a whole. 5,6,8,9,[21][22][23][24][25] Although further work would be needed to explicitly measure trust in research enterprises and researchers, our results may be indicative of trust of respondents in the scientific community in Jordan. Public engagement, dialogues, and communication have been suggested as means of establishing public trust among participants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…For example, in a Japanese study, while respondents were supportive of research, there was concern about the use of samples without consent. 8 Additionally, participants of an Egyptian, interview-based study expressed high value of having an informed consent. 9 There has been much debate with regards to what type of informed consent is needed for an effective biobank.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%