Attitudes Toward Open Science and Public Data Sharing

Abstract

Abstract. Central values of science are, among others, transparency, verifiability, replicability, and openness. The currently very prominent Open Science (OS) movement supports these values. Among its most important principles are open methodology (comprehensive and useful documentation of methods and materials used), open access to published research output, and open data (making collected data available for re-analyses). We here present a survey conducted among members of the German Psychological Society ( N = 337), in which we applied a mixed-methods approach (quantitative and qualitative data) to assess attitudes toward OS in general and toward data sharing more specifically. Attitudes toward OS were distinguished into positive expectations (“hopes”) and negative expectations (“fears”). These were un-correlated. There were generally more hopes associated with OS and data sharing than fears. Both hopes and fears were highest among early career researchers and lowest among professors. The analysis of the open answers revealed that generally positive attitudes toward data sharing (especially sharing of data related to a published article) are somewhat diminished by cost/benefit considerations. The results are discussed with respect to individual researchers’ behavior and with respect to structural changes in the research system.

Data Management and Sharing: Practices and Perceptions of Psychology Researchers

“…In order to inform ongoing efforts within and beyond the field of psychology to recognize data as an important research product, we surveyed active psychology researchers about their data-related practices. Previous work surveying data-related practices in psychology has generally focused on practices and perceptions related to open science (Abele-Brehm et al, 2019) and data sharing (Houtkoop et al, 2018;Washburn et al, 2018). However, for data and other materials to be efficiently examined, evaluated, and built upon, they must first be properly documented, organized, and saved.…”

Collaborating to Bring the Credibility Revolution to Giftedness and Talent Development Research

“…Public awareness of program evaluation can come with social and financial risk creating a perverse incentive for programs to selectively filter what information is shared. Similar struggles have been found in research as open practices become more prevalent (e.g., Abele-Brehm, Gollwitzer, Steinberg, & Schonbrodt, 2019). However, anecdotally, researchers whose work has been called into question who have admitted their errors and worked to correct them have often been well-received and serve as role models for others (e.g., psychologist Will Gervais).…”

Management und Bereitstellung von Forschungsdaten in der Psychologie: Überarbeitung der DGPs-Empfehlungen

“…Viele DGPs-Mitglieder, die im Jahr 2018 an unserer Umfrage zur Bekanntheit, Akzeptanz und Nützlichkeit unserer Empfehlungen teilgenommen haben (Abele-Brehm et al, 2019;Gollwitzer et al, 2018), haben sich insbesondere Präzisierungen bezüglich der folgenden Themen gewünscht: Rechte von Datenbereitstellenden, Regelungen bezüglich Koautorenschaft und Konfliktfällen, Datenschutz und Urheberrecht sowie Möglichkeiten einer eingeschränkten Bereitstellung von Daten bzw. eine Definition spezieller Konditionen für die Nachnutzung bereitgestellter Daten.…”