2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105346
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attitudes towards trauma-informed care in residential out-of-home care

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results in relation to compassion satisfaction are generally positive and in line with previous findings demonstrating that an ethic of care and a desire to sustain positive interpersonal relationships are central drivers in teachers’ practices (O’Toole & Simovska, 2021 ). However, the ARTIC results recorded in this study were lower overall compared to those involving other research participants and in other jurisdictions, including frontline health and social care professionals in Ireland (O’Toole & Dobutowitsch, 2020 ), educators in the United States (Kim et al, 2021 ), residential care professionals in Australia (Galvin et al, 2020 ), and student teachers in Canada (Rodger et al, 2020 ). All of these studies reported average or median ARTIC scores between 5.08 and 6.10.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…The results in relation to compassion satisfaction are generally positive and in line with previous findings demonstrating that an ethic of care and a desire to sustain positive interpersonal relationships are central drivers in teachers’ practices (O’Toole & Simovska, 2021 ). However, the ARTIC results recorded in this study were lower overall compared to those involving other research participants and in other jurisdictions, including frontline health and social care professionals in Ireland (O’Toole & Dobutowitsch, 2020 ), educators in the United States (Kim et al, 2021 ), residential care professionals in Australia (Galvin et al, 2020 ), and student teachers in Canada (Rodger et al, 2020 ). All of these studies reported average or median ARTIC scores between 5.08 and 6.10.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…In eight (53.3%) of the studies, outcomes were measured with a standardized instrument, five of which to assess staff’s perceptions and four to measure recipients’ functioning. Last, standardized instruments specifically designed to measure TIC framework were employed only in four (26.6%) studies: the Attitudes Related to Trauma-Informed Care (ARTIC) scale in Galvin et al (2020), the Trauma-Informed Organizational Toolkit (TIOT) in Gilmer et al (2021), and the Trauma-System Readiness Tool (TSRT) in Lang et al (2016) and Connell et al (2019).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the studies had TIC as their main framework, except for Goetz and Taylor-Trujillo (2012) that was based on the patient-focused intervention (PFI) model, while specifying TIC as the core element. The TIC interventions were diverse and developed ad hoc in the majority of studies (e.g., Green et al, 2021; Suarez et al, 2014 as described in Slavin & Suarez, 2013), with only three implementing a protocolized model (The Sanctuary Model in Elwyn et al, 2015 and Galvin et al, 2020, and the Six Core Strategies in Hale & Wendler, 2020). In other articles, the intervention was an implementation of TIC principles from either SAMHSA (Ashby et al, 2019) or Harris and Fallot (Keesler & Isham, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations