Attitudes vs. Actions

LaPiere, Richard T.

doi:10.2307/2570339

Cited by 1,521 publications

(604 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

552

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In practice, the correlation between attitudes and behaviours are not always high. [6][7][8] To complicate matters further, there may be conflicting attitudes at play. For example, an individual may have a positive attitude towards the National Health Service (NHS) but a negative attitude towards the current wave of administrative procedures within the NHS.…”

Section: What Are Attitudes?mentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing attitudes in dental education: Is it worthwhile?

2002

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: What Are Attitudes?mentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing attitudes in dental education: Is it worthwhile?

2002

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The controversy first appeared in the 1930s with the seminal studies on attitude -behaviour consistency by LaPiere (1934) and on trans-situational consistency of moral behaviour by Hartshorne and May (1928). LaPiere (1934) within the individual which influence both his verbal expressions and his actions' ' (p. 75). In a similar vein, Mischel (1968) stated that self-report trait measures and behaviour were correlated .30 at best.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

What moderates implicit—explicit consistency?

Hofmann¹,

Gschwendner²,

Nosek³

2005

European Review of Social Psychology

182

145

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Implicit and explicit indicators of attitudes or personality traits are positively, and variably, related. This review places the question of implicit -explicit consistency into the tradition of attitude/trait -behaviour consistency (e.g., Wicker, 1969). Drawing on dual-process models, such as the recent distinction between associative and propositional representations (Strack & Deutsch, 2004), we identify a working model of implicit -explicit consistency that organises the empirical evidence on implicit -explicit moderation into five factors: translation between implicit and explicit representations (e.g., representational strength, awareness), additional information integration for explicit representations (e.g., need for cognition), properties of explicit assessment (e.g., social desirability concerns), properties of implicit assessment (e.g., situational malleability), and research design factors (e.g., sampling bias, measurement correspondence).A significant proportion of psychological research over the last three decades concerns the automatic nature of information processing (Bargh, 1997;Khilstrom, 1999;Wegner & Bargh, 1998). Theory and empirical data have broadened notions of core psychological concepts like attitudes, stereotypes, self-concept, goals, personality, and self-esteem to include not Correspondence should be addressed to Wilhelm Hofmann, Fachbereich 8 -Psychologie Universita¨t Koblenz-Landau, Fortstraße 7, 76829 Landau, Germany. Email: hofmannw@ uni-landau.de Preparation of this chapter was supported by a grant from the German Science Foundation (DFG) to Manfred Schmitt (Schm 1092/5-1) and by a grant from the National Institute of Mental Health to Brian Nosek (R01 MH-068447). We would like to thank Rainer Banse, Boris Egloff, Malte Friese, Bertram Gawronski, and Jane Thompson for valuable comments on an earlier version of this chapter.EUROPEAN REVIEW OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY 2005, 16, 335 -390 2005 European Association of Experimental Social Psychology http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/pp/10463283.html DOI: 10.1080/10463280500443228 just the explicit assessments that are products of introspection, but also implicit components of these constructs that may occur outside of conscious awareness or control (Asendorpf, Banse, & Mu¨cke, 2002;Greenwald & Banaji, 1995;Wilson, Lindsey, & Schooler, 2000). Whereas implicit constructs are assumed to operate automatically and may be inaccessible to conscious experience, their explicit counterparts are conceptualised as reflective (conscious) and capacity-consuming mental representations that influence action through deliberation (e.g., Bargh, 1994;Greenwald & Banaji, 1995). This distinction plays a role in a variety of dual-process theories that distinguish two modes of information processing such as implicit vs explicit (Greenwald & Banaji, 1995;Wilson et al., 2000), automatic vs controlled (Bargh, 1994), impulsive vs reflective (Strack & Deutsch, 2004), and associative vs rule-based (Sloman, 1996;Smith & DeCoster, 2000). These theories share an assumpti...

show abstract

“…A theoretical and methodological basis of the empirical study of political tolerance was made by the concept of values as abstract ideas expressing human beliefs about behavior types and preferred goals, as well as the theory of social attitudes associated with the ideas of La Piere (1934) and Jadov (1979).…”

Section: Purpose Of the Studymentioning

confidence: 99%

Attitudes And Values Of Political Tolerance In Minds Of Russian Youth

Elissev¹

2018

The European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Attitudes vs. Actions

Cited by 1,521 publications

References 0 publications

Assessing attitudes in dental education: Is it worthwhile?

Assessing attitudes in dental education: Is it worthwhile?

What moderates implicit—explicit consistency?

Attitudes And Values Of Political Tolerance In Minds Of Russian Youth

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About