2014
DOI: 10.1111/isqu.12138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attracting Investment: Governments' Strategic Role in Labor Rights Protection

Abstract: What is the relationship between respect for labor rights and foreign direct investment (FDI)? This study explores this connection with an emphasis on the strategic role of governments in attracting FDI. We present a formal model demonstrating that governments can do so by setting the level of labor rights protection and, as a consequence, investors will choose to invest in the face of tough labor regulations or cease investing, anticipating that the costs of abiding by these regulations will be too high. The … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other analyses suggest that foreign direct investment also could be a mechanism for rights‐related improvements, especially when multinational corporations avoid locating production in jurisdictions with questionable rights‐related records. If developing country governments are keen to attract FDI, due to its potential positive effects on wages, employment, and/or technological development, such a linkage might further incentivize upgrading (Barry et al 2013, Payton and Woo 2014; but also see Arel‐Bundock, 2017, Bodea & Ye, 2018, Garriga, 2016).…”
Section: Worker Rights and Global Supply Chains: Mechanisms For Upgradingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other analyses suggest that foreign direct investment also could be a mechanism for rights‐related improvements, especially when multinational corporations avoid locating production in jurisdictions with questionable rights‐related records. If developing country governments are keen to attract FDI, due to its potential positive effects on wages, employment, and/or technological development, such a linkage might further incentivize upgrading (Barry et al 2013, Payton and Woo 2014; but also see Arel‐Bundock, 2017, Bodea & Ye, 2018, Garriga, 2016).…”
Section: Worker Rights and Global Supply Chains: Mechanisms For Upgradingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Merk (), for example, finds that large multinational apparel manufacturers, many of them headquartered in Hong Kong, Korea, and Taiwan, locate subsidiaries throughout Asia and Latin America and use the threat of relocation to press for lenient labor regulations. Congruent with this case study research, Payton and Woo () present a formal model and quantitative evidence showing that countries with weaker labor laws attract FDI . According to this view, firms that receive FDI strive to reduce their production costs, including labor costs, to please their foreign investors.…”
Section: Globalization and Employers’ Opinionsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Foreign firms have tended to hire unskilled, blue-collar labour at lower pay than domestic firms in developing countries (Coniglio et al, 2015). However, Payton and Woo (2014) argue that FDI inflows decrease with stricter labour regulations owing to rising costs of adherence, raising cost-efficiency concerns for foreign investors, even those intending to venture into developed Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries (Alam and Shah, 2013). So simply using minimum wages as the measurement of unit labour costs will definitely predict a reduced number of FDI projects in a country, as found in a hospitality industry study (Falk, 2016).…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%