1987
DOI: 10.1016/0362-546x(87)90061-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attractors for the Bénard problem: existence and physical bounds on their fractal dimension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
174
0
4

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 223 publications
(182 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
4
174
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…By [7], we know that the solution (u, T ) is analytic in time and all H m norms of (u(t, Ψ 0 ), T (t, Ψ 0 )) remains uniformly bounded in time for t ≥ δ > 0. Therefore by Theorem 3.5, we have where K = min{k | α k = 0, k is odd}, and t is sufficiently large.…”
Section: Structural Stability Theoremsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By [7], we know that the solution (u, T ) is analytic in time and all H m norms of (u(t, Ψ 0 ), T (t, Ψ 0 )) remains uniformly bounded in time for t ≥ δ > 0. Therefore by Theorem 3.5, we have where K = min{k | α k = 0, k is odd}, and t is sufficiently large.…”
Section: Structural Stability Theoremsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, for the RayleighBénard convection with the finite Prandtl numbers, readers are referred to Chandrasekhar [2], to Drazin and Reid [5] for linear theories; to Foias, Manley and Temam [7] for the existence and physical bounds of attractors; to Rabinowitz [18] for the existence of rectangular solutions; and to Ma and Wang [12] for attractor bifurcation. For the case regarding the infinite Prandtl number, the readers are referred to Constantin and Doering [3,4] for the upper bounds of the minimal conduction value; to Schnaubelt and Busse [21] for two-dimensional convection rolls; to Keken [9] and to Yanagisawa and Tamagishi [25] for mantle and spherical shell convection studies, respectively; to X. Wang [23,24] for the justification of the infinite Prandtl number convection as the infinite Prandtl number limit of the Boussinesq equations; and to Park [15,16] for the attractor bifurcation theory of the infinite Prandtl number convection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof. By [6], we know that the solution (u(t, ψ 0 ), T (t, Ψ 0 )) is analytic in time and all the H m norms of u(t, ψ 0 ), T (t, Ψ 0 ) remain uniformly bounded in time for t ≥ δ > 0, m ≥ 0.…”
Section: Structural Stability For the Infinite Prandtl Number Convectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, for the Rayleigh-Bénard convection with the finite Prandtl numbers, readers are referred to Chandrasekhar [1], to Drazin and Reid [4] for linear theories; to Foias, Manley and Temam [6] for the existence and physical bounds of attractors; to Rabinowitz [16] for the existence of rectangular solutions; and to Ma and Wang [10,11] for attractor bifurcation. For the case regarding the infinite Prandtl number, the readers are referred to Constantin and Doering [2,3] for the upper bounds of the minimal conduction value; to Schnaubelt and Busse [19] for two-dimensional convection rolls; to Keken [8] and to Yanagisawa and Tamagishi [23] for mantle and spherical shell convection studies, respectively; to X. Wang [21,22] for the justification of the infinite Prandtl number convection as the infinite Prandtl number limit of the Boussinesq equations; and to Park [14] for the existence of attractor bifurcation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Density di erences are induced, for instance, by gradients of temperature arising by non uniform heating of the uid. In the Boussinesq approximation of a large class of ow problems thermodynamical coe cients such as viscosity, speci c heat and thermal conductivity, can be assumed constant leading to a coupled system with linear second order operators in the Navier-Stokes and heat equations (see, e.g., [10], [11], [15], [21]). However, there are some uids like lubri cants or some plasma ow for which this is no longer an accurate assumption (see, e.g., [14], [19]).…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%