2000
DOI: 10.1080/09595230096156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attrition in group therapy with alcoholics: a survival analysis

Abstract: Three hundred and twenty-nine alcohol dependent patients, diagnosed according to DSM. III-R criteria who had participated in one of five different psychotherapy groups over a 5-year period, were studied using survival analysis statistics. Patients were followed-up until their discharge or withdrawal from the group to determine their retention in therapy, and to examine the effect of gender, age and family situation on compliance. Retention rates at 6, 12 and 24 months were 61%, 49% and 37%, respectively. Media… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Darnall, in particular, points to the danger of ''out of sight, out of mind'' (personal communication) and to clinicians' implicit theories behind why clients leave that are not always accurate. Because a substance-related diagnosis emerged as a particular risk in this setting, it may be worth noting that Monras and Gual (2000) echo this finding and conclude that, in their study of 329 adults diagnosed with alcohol dependence, the first 3 months of treatment were particularly important in participants' deciding whether or not to commit to group psychotherapy.…”
Section: Discussion and Applications To Practicementioning
confidence: 91%
“…Darnall, in particular, points to the danger of ''out of sight, out of mind'' (personal communication) and to clinicians' implicit theories behind why clients leave that are not always accurate. Because a substance-related diagnosis emerged as a particular risk in this setting, it may be worth noting that Monras and Gual (2000) echo this finding and conclude that, in their study of 329 adults diagnosed with alcohol dependence, the first 3 months of treatment were particularly important in participants' deciding whether or not to commit to group psychotherapy.…”
Section: Discussion and Applications To Practicementioning
confidence: 91%
“…These key moments are comparable to those reported by Delgadillo et al (2014), who conducted a similar study in a population receiving an individual treatment of "low intensity" (e.g., psychosocial help, psychoeducation) for anxiety problems and depressive symptoms. Another study targeting group-format psychotherapy for alcoholism, however, identified later moments of cessation (Monras & Gual, 2000). It should be noted that these authors' treatment was held over 2 years and that their life table was based on 4-week intervals, limiting the precision of their analysis and comparison with the present study.…”
Section: Key Moments Of Treatment Discontinuationmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Such a high standard error may indicate bias, as these high values do not necessarily represent moments when cessation of treatment is more likely. Based on the analysis of the life table, the survival curve, the hazard (or failure rates), and relying on the work of Monras and Gual (2000), three key moments of cessation of treatment were identified: (a) early cessations (after 2 or 3 sessions); (b) short-term cessations (after 5 sessions); and (c) medium-term cessations (after 11 sessions).…”
Section: Main Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%