Atypia in cervical cytology as a risk factor for intraepithelial neoplasia

Noumoff, Joel S.

doi:10.1016/0002-9378(87)90065-2

Cited by 73 publications

(41 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…21 Conversely, colposcopy would be excessive in 50-75% of the patients. 3,18 In our study, pregnancy was associated with a higher risk of false negative smears. Cytologic false negative rates close to 10% during pregnancy have been published.…”

supporting

confidence: 48%

Cervicography

Dreyfus²,

Ritter³

et al. 1997

Acta Cytologica

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

supporting

confidence: 48%

Cervicography

Dreyfus²,

Ritter³

et al. 1997

Acta Cytologica

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Such cases may represent poorly presented cells derived from more significant abnormalities, and hence rates of SIL on follow-up may range as high as 50%. 14,15 The need for a repeat specimen (after an appropriate interval) or other follow-up should be emphasized in the report. Optimal specimen collection and alternative, liquid-based collection methods may reduce the Communication between clinician and cytologist is especially critical when dealing with AGUS cases.…”

Section: Ascus Due To Compromised Specimenmentioning

confidence: 99%

ASCUS and AGUS Criteria

Solomon

Frable²,

Vooijs³

et al. 1998

Acta Cytologica

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Policies for follow-up after finding atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) in cytology vary from repeat cytology [2][3][4] to immediate referral for colposcopy and biopsy [5][6][7][8] . Referral of all women with ASCUS/LSIL in cytology to the colposcopy clinic and the subsequent histological examination yields substantial costs for the health care system 9 and often creates feelings of anxiety and discomfort for the women concerned 10,11 .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Genotyping of human papillomavirus in triaging of low-grade cervical cytology

Söderlund-Strand

Eklund

Kemetli³

et al. 2011

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Genotyping of human papillomavirus in triaging of low-grade cervical cytology.Söderlund Strand, Anna; Eklund, Carina; Kemetli, Levent; Grillner, Lena; Törnberg, Sven; Dillner, Joakim; Dillner, Lena Genotyping of human papillomavirus in triaging of low-grade cervical cytology. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 205(2), 145.e1-145.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2011.03.056 General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.• Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research.• You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. The study was conducted in Malmö and Stockholm, Sweden.Reprints will not be available. implying that HPV-genotyping could be useful for optimization of triaging strategies.

show abstract

Atypia in cervical cytology as a risk factor for intraepithelial neoplasia

Cited by 73 publications

References 3 publications

Cervicography

Cervicography

ASCUS and AGUS Criteria

Genotyping of human papillomavirus in triaging of low-grade cervical cytology

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About