2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10614-009-9169-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Auctions and Differential Pricing: Optimal Seller and Bidder Strategies in Second-chance Offers

Abstract: The second chance offer is a common seller practice on eBay. It consists of price discrimination against the losing bidder, who is offered an identical item at the value of his or her highest bid. Prior work has shown that, if the goods are private-value goods and price discrimination is certain, rational bidders can anticipate it and accordingly modify their bidding strategies; this results in revenue loss for the seller. This paper hence examines the impact of randomized price discrimination. It examines a s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They find that the two‐stage game yields higher revenue than the sequential auction. Sun and Vora (2009) consider a two‐stage game, where a first‐price auction determines the winner of the first unit, and in a second stage, the auctioneer offers additional units to k losing bidders using a take‐it‐or‐leave‐it offer that randomizes between a second‐chance offer to buy at the bidder's bid in the auction and a fixed price (i.e., there is no price discrimination in the second stage). Using simulations, they derive Bayesian (near‐Nash) equilibrium strategies for the case with N=8$N = 8$ bidders.…”
Section: Literature On Second‐chance Offers and Reputation Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They find that the two‐stage game yields higher revenue than the sequential auction. Sun and Vora (2009) consider a two‐stage game, where a first‐price auction determines the winner of the first unit, and in a second stage, the auctioneer offers additional units to k losing bidders using a take‐it‐or‐leave‐it offer that randomizes between a second‐chance offer to buy at the bidder's bid in the auction and a fixed price (i.e., there is no price discrimination in the second stage). Using simulations, they derive Bayesian (near‐Nash) equilibrium strategies for the case with N=8$N = 8$ bidders.…”
Section: Literature On Second‐chance Offers and Reputation Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, GAs have been used in scientific literature devoted to auctions. Some examples are Andreoni and Miller (1995), Dawid (1999), Numnonda and Annakkage (1999), Wen and David (2001), Jennings (2002, 2003), Cliff (2003), Saez et al (2007) and Sun and Vora (2009). Essentially, a GA is an iterative procedure that maintains a population of structures that are candidate solutions for specific domain challenges.…”
Section: Optimizing the Decision System By Means Of Genetic Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, what are symmetric bidding strategies? In [1], an analytical approach and genetic algorithm simulation are used to answer this question. We summarize the result of the Nash equilibrium analysis of a 8-bidder-2-stage price discrimination game as follows:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%