2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.specom.2005.02.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Audiovisual representation of prosody in expressive speech communication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
29
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although complementary, visual features have been shown to have a weaker cue strength than auditory ones for the distinction between statements and questions. This was observed for instance for Swedish (House, 2002;Granström & House, 2004) or English (Srinivasan & Massaro, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Although complementary, visual features have been shown to have a weaker cue strength than auditory ones for the distinction between statements and questions. This was observed for instance for Swedish (House, 2002;Granström & House, 2004) or English (Srinivasan & Massaro, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Moreover, the data elicitation method allowed to control for such idiosyncratically variable factors like degree of emphasis (e.g., Ladd and Morton, 1997;Liberman and Pierrehumbert, 1984) and personal involvement (e.g., Crespo-Sendra et al, 2010;Granström and House, 2005), thus increasing the comparability of the resulting pitch properties across the dataset. Experimental materials for this study followed the design of previous cross-linguistic experiments conducted by Grabe (1998).…”
Section: Data Elicitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since head nods are found to be powerful cues to prominence in previous study [19], we focus on the synchronization of head nods with particular syllables in prosodic word. The temporal relationship are investigated between the peak points (i.e.…”
Section: Head Motion Correlation With Textual Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%