2017
DOI: 10.1108/cg-02-2017-0026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Audit quality following the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board’s operation

Abstract: Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the extent to which the transition from self-regulation to heteronomy has changed the gap in audit quality between Big Four and non-Big Four auditors. Design/methodology/approach This study analyzes publicly held companies in the USA between 1999 and 2012 using univariate analysis, multivariate analysis and quantile regression analysis. Audit quality is measured with discretionary accruals. Findings This study shows an insignificant difference in audit qu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
3
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Changes in audit regulations have heightened the importance of quality control review within the audit firm for achieving high audit quality (Casterella et al, 2009;Schafer, 2011;AICPA, 2014;Chiu, Chien & Lin, 2017). A quality control process must be in place within the audit firm for continuous quality control monitoring and the reports issued by the auditors must be reliable, useful and timely (CAQ, 2014).…”
Section: Audit Process and Its Influence On Audit Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes in audit regulations have heightened the importance of quality control review within the audit firm for achieving high audit quality (Casterella et al, 2009;Schafer, 2011;AICPA, 2014;Chiu, Chien & Lin, 2017). A quality control process must be in place within the audit firm for continuous quality control monitoring and the reports issued by the auditors must be reliable, useful and timely (CAQ, 2014).…”
Section: Audit Process and Its Influence On Audit Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As it involves one of the big five auditors, Arthur Anderson, United States Securities and Exchange Commission develops Sarbanes Oxley Act (SOX) as a guide to improve controlling and monitoring function, business ethic and regulatory enhancement. It includes improving the role of auditor and regulator (Chiu et al , 2017; Landsman et al , 2009; Millar and Bowen, 2011; Petra and Loukatos, 2009). After SOX implementation, most firms shift earnings management from the accrual method to the real manipulation one (Cohen et al , 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tujuan dalam literature artikel adalah 1) Untuk mengetahui peran kualitas audit dalam memoderasi efek dari konflik keagenan prinsipal-principal, dan 2) Untuk mengetahui kompetensi kompetensi auditor dan independensinya terhadap kualitas audit. (Sulaiman, 2016), (Reheul et al, 2017), (Safdar et al, 2019) 2 Kuantitatif 23 52.3 (Fu et al, 2015), (Salehi et al, 2016), (ZGARNI et al, 2016), (Jung et al, 2016), (Alzoubi, 2016), (Amiruddin et al, 2016), (Brown et al, 2016), (Salehi et al, 2017), (Chiu et al, 2017), (Hoag et al, 2017), (Mousavi Shiri et al, 2018), Kusumawati & Syamsuddin, 2018), (Coffie et al, 2018), (Ocak & Can, 2019), (Kalanjati et al, 2019), (Salehi, Komeili, et al, 2019), (Orazalin & Akhmetzhanov, 2019), (Salehi, Fakhri Mahmoudi, et al, 2019), (Tessema, 2020), (Sitanggang et al, 2020), (Yeung & Lento,4,5 11,4 11,4 2,3 4,5 2,32,32,3 9,1 4,5 2,32,32,3 4,54,5 2,3 4,5 2,3 4,5 2,3 4,5 2,32,3 2,3 2, Dari tabel di atas menunjukkan bahwa sebagian besar literature menggunakan jenis penelitian kuantitatif yaitu sebanyak 23 literatur (52,3%), selanjutnya literatur dengan jenis penelitian empiris sebanyak 8 literatur (18...…”
Section: Metode Penelitianunclassified
“…(Salehi et al, 2016);(ZGARNI et al, 2016);(Jung et al, 2016);(Kaawaase et al, 2016);(Alfraih, 2016);(Alzoubi, 2016);(Brown et al, 2016);(Salehi et al, 2017);(Chiu et al, 2017);(Reheul et al, 2017);(Fernando & Thevaranjan, 2017);(Anis, 2017);(Mutakkin et al, 2017); dan(Hoag et al, 2017) …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%