2003
DOI: 10.1080/11024159850191607
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Auditing surgical outcome: ten years with the Swedish vascular registry-Swedvasc

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
48
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…20,21 Several articles have also studied the external and internal validation of Swedvasc showing high accuracy regarding stroke and death within 30 days postoperatively. [22][23][24] We obtained data for patients who underwent intervention for symptomatic carotid stenosis in Sweden between May 12, 2008, and May 31, 2011, and were recorded in Swedvasc (nϭ2763). The study was approved by the regional ethical review board in Gothenburg.…”
Section: Study Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20,21 Several articles have also studied the external and internal validation of Swedvasc showing high accuracy regarding stroke and death within 30 days postoperatively. [22][23][24] We obtained data for patients who underwent intervention for symptomatic carotid stenosis in Sweden between May 12, 2008, and May 31, 2011, and were recorded in Swedvasc (nϭ2763). The study was approved by the regional ethical review board in Gothenburg.…”
Section: Study Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earlier validation of the Swedvasc database has shown over 90% accuracy of variables (15). We performed further validation with a randomly selected sample of 140 patients (7.6%) from the study cohort.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Swedvasc is a population-based, vascular surgery registry covering more than 95% of all arterial vascular procedures performed in the Swedish population (8.5 million) and containing detailed, prospectively registered information on indications, risk factors, and surgical procedures for each individual (15 To study amputation-free survival, we designated our primary outcome as ipsilateral amputation, defined as first amputation above the ankle (i.e., major amputation) in the limb on which bypass was performed (i.e., ipsilateral limb), or death from any cause-whichever occurred first. The observation period began on the index date and continued until the primary outcome event occurred or, if no event occurred, until 31 December 2005.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Validity of the registry data is ap rerequisite for any analysis. the accepted level of data can be achieved by revalidation and comparison with the national inpatient registry (8, 15,16). Swedvasc has an automatic linkage on individual patient level to the Population registry (recording death within 3w eeks of every event) and has been givenpermission also to cross-check with the Hospital Discharge registry (17).…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%