2009
DOI: 10.1506/car.26.2.8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Auditor Tenure and the Ability to Meet or Beat Earnings Forecasts*

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

7
111
1
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 322 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
7
111
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Kabir, Sharma, Islam, and Salat (2010) and Jeong and Rho (2004) were unable to find evidence linking the size of the auditing firm and the financial performance of the firms they represent. A number of studies (Reichelt & Wang, 2010;Knechel, Naiker, & Pacheko, 2007;Balsam, Krishnan, & Yang, 2003;Krishnan, 2003;Gramling & Stone, 2001) have claimed that the specialization of auditors is associated with firm performance and that long-term auditor-client relationships enhance client-specific knowledge (Ghosh & Moon, 2005;Mansi, Maxwell, & Miller, 2004;Myers et al, 2003;Johnstone, Bedard, & Biggs, 2002); however, many other studies (Davis, Soo, & Trompeter, 2009;Gul, Fung, & Jaggi, 2009;Boone, Khurana, & Raman, 2008) have published findings that contradict these claims.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Kabir, Sharma, Islam, and Salat (2010) and Jeong and Rho (2004) were unable to find evidence linking the size of the auditing firm and the financial performance of the firms they represent. A number of studies (Reichelt & Wang, 2010;Knechel, Naiker, & Pacheko, 2007;Balsam, Krishnan, & Yang, 2003;Krishnan, 2003;Gramling & Stone, 2001) have claimed that the specialization of auditors is associated with firm performance and that long-term auditor-client relationships enhance client-specific knowledge (Ghosh & Moon, 2005;Mansi, Maxwell, & Miller, 2004;Myers et al, 2003;Johnstone, Bedard, & Biggs, 2002); however, many other studies (Davis, Soo, & Trompeter, 2009;Gul, Fung, & Jaggi, 2009;Boone, Khurana, & Raman, 2008) have published findings that contradict these claims.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet Davis et al (2009) found that firms with long tenure (13-15 years or more) are more likely to report levels of discretionary accruals that allow them to meet or beat earnings forecasts. They also found the same for firms with short tenure of two or three years.…”
Section: Reported Earnings and Measures Of Audit Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies found evidence of lower audit quality in the early years of the auditor-client relationship, with audit quality improving as audit tenure lengthens (Beck & Soloman, 1988;Geiger & Raghunandan, 2002;Carcello & Nagy, 2004;Chi & Huang, 2004;Boone et al, 2008). Other studies found that audit firm tenure affects audit quality adversely (Hoyle, 1978;Davis et al, 2009;Al-Thuneibat et al, 2011). These studies on audit tenure also contribute to the arguments regarding mandatory auditor rotation and audit independence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One of the consequences of mandatory firm rotation could be an increase in the number of audit failures. The Treadway Commission Report (Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission [COSO] 1987) suggests that a significant number of financial frauds involved companies that had recently changed their auditor, and others suggest that a greater proportion of audit failures occur on newly acquired audit clients (Berton 1991;Petty and Cuganesan 1996;Geiger and Raghunandan 2002;Johnson et al 2002;Myers et al 2003;Carcello and Nagy 2004;Stanley and DeZoort 2007;Davis et al 2009;Gul et al 2009). Further, Palmrose (1986Palmrose ( , 1991 documents greater litigation risk to auditors in the early years of an engagement, and the AICPA's Quality Control Inquiry Committee of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Practice Section concluded that, in its analysis of 406 cases of alleged auditor failures between 1979 and 1991, audit failure occurred almost three times more often when the audit firm was engaged in its first or second year (AICPA 1992).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%