Auditory Perceptual Problems in Children: Considerations for the Otolaryngologist and Audiologist

Musiek, Frank E.; Geurkink, Nathan A.

doi:10.1002/lary.1980.90.6.962

Cited by 32 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Our observation of the ADP in LD children is not a recent or exclusive finding. In their study of LD children, Musiek and Geurkink (1980) alluded to the components of the ADP in several cases with strikingly similar findings. Pinheiro (1977) reported similar results in a number of LD children.…”

Section: Central Auditory Test Findingsmentioning

confidence: 81%

Myelination of the Corpus Callosum and Auditory Processing Problems in Children: Theoretical and Clinical Correlates

Musiek¹,

Gollegly²,

Baran³

1984

Semin Hear

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Central Auditory Test Findingsmentioning

confidence: 81%

Myelination of the Corpus Callosum and Auditory Processing Problems in Children: Theoretical and Clinical Correlates

Musiek¹,

Gollegly²,

Baran³

1984

Semin Hear

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The present study is unique, however, in that a test battery approach was utilized including monotic and nonspeech measures, as well as dichotic measures utilizing sentence information which are less likely t o be affected by peripheral hearing loss. Due to the likelihood that central auditory processing disorders are heterogeneous, there is general agreement that a test battery approach is preferable to a single measure for quantifying central auditory function (Musiek & Geurkink, 1980;Pinheiro, 1977b;Stecker, 1992;Willeford, 1977). Auditory duration and pitch pattern measures employ similar paradigms and response demands; however, overall performance among AD subjects on the duration pattern test (51.2%) was substantially lower than that for pitch pattern sequencing (66.2%).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Central Auditory Processing in Alzheimerʼs Disease

1995

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: This investigation was designed to determine whether people in the early to middle phases of Alzheimer's disease (AD) show impaired central auditory processing as compared with nondemented elderly.Design: A peripheral and central auditory test battery was administered to 10 subjects diagnosed with mild-to-moderate AD based on a neuropsychological test battery and radiographic techniques, and a control group of 10 subjects with no evidence of dementia, matched for age, gender, and average degree of hearing loss. Immittance audiometry, pure-tone and speech audiometry, and otoacoustic emissions were recorded in all subjects. Central auditory assessment included the synthetic sentence identification with ipsilateral competing message, dichotic digits, dichotic sentence identification, pitch patterns, and duration patterns.Results: Peripheral auditory status was statistically similar between subject groups. Neither average high frequency hearing sensitivity nor mean speech recognition ability was significantly different. However, a significant difference was noted between groups for average low frequency hearing sensitivity in the left ear @ < 0.06). Subjects with AD showed slightly poorer low frequency thresholds versus matched controls. Based on analysis of performance on each measure of the central auditory test battery, the AD group scored significantly lower than the matched control group on four of the five measures utilized. Differences for right versus left ear performance were found among AD subjects. Conclusions:Overall patterns in findings cannot be easily explained as artifacts of cognitive decline. Results support screening for central auditory dysfunction in the AD population, since impaired processing could influence psychiatric assessment of cognitive deficit as well as audiologic management of peripheral hearing loss in this population. (Ear & Hearing 1995;16;230-238) A significant amount of literature has attempted to reveal a relationship between hearing impairment and cognitive dysfunction (Gennis, Gamy,

show abstract

“…On the other hand, other authors (21,22) compared different forms to answer (verbal, motor and humming) while analyzing the performance of children with disorder of normal learning. They found that the children were able to perform humming, but they presented great difficulty while answering orally or manually, unlike the children who were considered normal, which showed little or no difference in response.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Teste melódico de processamento temporal: análise de diferentes formas de respostas

Betti

Bruno

Oppitz

et al. 2016

Audiol., Commun. Res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: Evaluate the results of the different forms of responses in the melodic temporal ordering test in relation to frequency and duration. Methods: The sample was composed of 33 subjects, for convenience, aged between 17 and 27 years old, normal hearing individuals, presenting no complaints regarding auditory processing and having no hearing impairment, syndromes or craniofacial malformation history; no physical disability (manual), as well as no neurological and speech impairment and education level greater than nine years. They were subjected to the temporal ordering test with musical tone, called melodic Duration Pattern Test (DPT) and Frequency Pattern Test (FPT), applied under three response conditions (motor, humming and motor), performed on the same date. For that, at a first moment, the induvial were asked to recognize the stimuli verbally, then characterize the stimuli in an imitative pattern and, finally, to recognize the stimuli in manual responses. Results: Statistically significant differences were not observed between the three forms of responses for DPT and FPT. However, it is remarkable that there was a greater number of changes for FPT than for DPT, regardless the form of response. Furthermore, motor and verbal responses presented more changes for humming, in FPT. Conclusion: The different forms of response (motor, humming and motor) for the melodic DPT and FPT did not change the results.Keywords: Hearing; Hearing tests; Auditory perception; Social discrimination; Auditory cortex RESUMO Objetivo: Avaliar os resultados nas diferentes formas de respostas no teste melódico de ordenação temporal para frequência e duração. Métodos: A amostra foi composta por 33 sujeitos, por conveniência, com idade entre 17 e 27 anos, normo-ouvintes, sem queixas de processamento auditivo e de histórico de risco para alterações auditivas, ausência de síndromes ou malformações craniofaciais, deficiência física (manual), bem como de alterações neurológicas e de linguagem e com escolaridade superior a nove anos de estudo. Os sujeitos foram submetidos ao teste de ordenação temporal com tom musical, a saber: Teste de Padrão de Duração (TPD) e Teste de Padrão de Frequência (TPF), aplicados sob três condições de respostas (verbal, humming e motor,) e realizados na mesma data. Para isso, os sujeitos foram solicitados, primeiramente, a reconhecer os estímulos verbalmente, em seguida a caracterizar os estímulos em um padrão imitativo e, por fim, a identificar os estímulos com respostas manuais. Resultados: Não houve diferenças significativas entre as três formas de resposta para o TPD e TPF. No entanto, observou-se que, para o TPF, houve maior número de alterações que o TPD, independente da forma de resposta. Ainda, as formas motor e verbal tiveram mais alterações que o humming, no TPF. Conclusão: As diferentes formas de respostas (verbal, humming e motor) para os testes TPD e TPF melódicos não alteram o seu resultado.

show abstract

Auditory Perceptual Problems in Children: Considerations for the Otolaryngologist and Audiologist

Cited by 32 publications

References 10 publications

Myelination of the Corpus Callosum and Auditory Processing Problems in Children: Theoretical and Clinical Correlates

Myelination of the Corpus Callosum and Auditory Processing Problems in Children: Theoretical and Clinical Correlates

Central Auditory Processing in Alzheimerʼs Disease

Teste melódico de processamento temporal: análise de diferentes formas de respostas

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About