C entral (aortic) blood pressure (BP) waveform indices independently predict cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality, 1 but the physiological mechanisms to explain the waveform morphology remain disputed. The well-established wave reflection theory ascribes transmission of discrete forward and backward (incident and reflected) waves as the principal contributory factor underlying the shape of the central BP waveform.2 However, while providing a plausible description of central BP morphology, recent studies have concluded that the influence of discrete reflected waves on central BP may be less than originally conceived, and this is probably because of wave dispersion along the aorta and entrapment of reflected waves in the periphery. 3,4 Indeed, augmentation of central BP may be largely attributable to forward wave propagation (as a result of left ventricular [LV] ejection) and proximal aortic reservoir function. [5][6][7][8][9] Importantly, wave separation theory obscures the pressure buffering role of the highly elastic proximal aorta (ie, the aortic reservoir), and a failure to consider this function may lead to incorrect interpretations of the physiology underlying central BP waveform morphology.The reservoir-excess pressure concept is an alternate method proposed to explain the underlying physiology of the aortic BP waveform. This method has been used invasively to study changes in aortic BP associated with both aging and exercise. 6,8 Moreover, indices derived from this model were recently shown to predict cardiovascular events (fatal and nonfatal) and procedures independent from brachial BP and other conventional cardiovascular risk parameters (eg, age, sex, cholesterol, smoking, diabetes mellitus), including Framingham risk score, in an analysis of the Conduit Artery Function Evaluation study. 10 In accounting for the reservoir function of the aorta, 7,11 the reservoir-excess pressure model is founded on the basis that aortic BP can be separated into © 2014 American Heart Association, Inc.