2018 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/ecce.2018.8557820
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Augmenting the Traditional Bus-Branch Model for Seismic Resilience Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The estimated wind loading of towers is an integer value chosen with the range of possible wind values that result in a failure rate between 0.00127 and 0.00102. Computing the wind loading with the knowledge of the failure rate is performed using (4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The estimated wind loading of towers is an integer value chosen with the range of possible wind values that result in a failure rate between 0.00127 and 0.00102. Computing the wind loading with the knowledge of the failure rate is performed using (4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The studies evaluating power system consequences (such as the loss of load, energy not served, etc.) for different HILP events: 1) Augment power system models (or use more detailed node-breaker version of the models), so that asset fragilities can be translated to power system contingencies [4], and 2) Utilize asset fragility curves that are either developed by modeling structural integrity of assets using tools like Structural Analysis Program (SAP2000) [3], or developed using real world data based academic models such as log-normal functions [5]. However, the availability of real world data for infrastructure damage and fragility is often very limited for such HILP extreme events.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modeling the peak amount of load lost is challenging as that at minimum requires the modeling of protection equipment or relaying at some level-either by using a nodebreaker version of the system case-file or by augmenting the traditional bus-branch version of case-file to model protection equipment [55,56]-and potentially the dynamic behavior of both load and generation [57,58]. These challenges also arise in cascading failure modeling and are described in relevant literature [57,[59][60][61][62][63][64][65].…”
Section: Operation-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Vulnerability index (VI), degradation index (DI), restoration efficiency index (REI) and microgrid resilience index (MRI) [15] , and • Maximum number of customers out of service [16] All of these metrics do a relatively good job at describing power systems resilience to an external disturbance, however, they are not very useful in describing the contribution of any particular power generation asset (for example the Grand Coulee hydropower plant) or family of generation assets (for example hydropower as a whole) towards achieving that level of resilience. To address this problem for the power transmission system, prior work has used augmentation of traditional bus-branch model into node-breaker model so that the fragility and vulnerability of each substation asset (such as the transformers and circuit breakers) can be included in the evaluation of resilience levels [17]. Each family of assets contributes in its own way towards resilience and it is important to understand how to utilize these assets to their fullest potential.…”
Section: A System Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%