2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2004.09.059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Augments and Allografts in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The studies available that have evaluated the safety and effectiveness of using homologous structural grafts from musculoskeletal tissue banks during revision surgery present limited numbers of cases and lack long-term postoperative follow-up. 20 , 21 , 22 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The studies available that have evaluated the safety and effectiveness of using homologous structural grafts from musculoskeletal tissue banks during revision surgery present limited numbers of cases and lack long-term postoperative follow-up. 20 , 21 , 22 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cortical allograft bone was used to treat large segmental defects, while cavitary defects were filled with cancellous allograft or autograft bone [25]. Management of bone deficiency with bulk allograft had a reported survivorship of 79.4% to 83% at 8 years of followup [22, 23]. An 85% survivorship was reported at an average of 4.2 years of followup [26].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to some authors the best results came from augments using a graft. The failure rate for augments used alone stood at 48 % compared to only 19.2 % in the case of graft combination [32].…”
Section: Aori Type IImentioning
confidence: 96%