Aussteifungsscheiben aus unbewehrtem Mauerwerk – Analyse und Bewertung von Berechnungsmodellen und Bemessungsmethoden

Kranzler, Thomas

doi:10.1002/9783433606964.ch8

Cited by 2 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…For further information (analysis, comparisons) regarding the different assumptions, theoretical models, material parameters, backgrounds etc. see [13], [16], [17] and in particular [14]. Tables 6 gives an…”

Section: Compilation Of the Calculation Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…If k w ≤ 0.06, it is sufficient to use the equation for bending (flexural) failure only, see Table 8 and [17]. In any case, the test results show that the reduction of the shear resistance to 33 % according to the Technical Approval of the blocks is definitely not objectively justified for the investigated blocks.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 97%

“…Für Wände mit k w ≤ 0,06 ist es demnach völlig ausreichend, die horizontale Tragfähigkeit mit der Gleichung für Biegedruckversagen zu ermitteln (s. Tabelle 8 und [17]). …”

Section: Zusammenfassungunclassified

“…Der Vollständigkeit halber werden dabei auch die Berechnungsergebnisse unter ausschließlicher Zugrundelegung von DIN EN 1996-1-1, also ohne den deutschen Nationalen Anhang aufgeführt, welche [15] entnommen wurden. Weitergehende Informationen zu den Hintergründen der unterschiedlichen Regelungen (Annahmen, Modelle, Materialparameter…) finden sich in [13], [16], [17] und insbesondere in [14]. Tabelle (Table 7 and Figs.…”

Section: Vergleich Der Berechnungsergebnisseunclassified

See 3 more Smart Citations

Shear tests on external clay unit masonry walls / Monolithische Ziegelaußenwände unter Schubbeanspruchung

Kranzler

2016

Mauerwerk

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Shear tests on external clay unit masonry walls Monolithische Ziegelaußenwände unter SchubbeanspruchungMonolithic external walls are commonly made of thermally insulated clay blocks that do not require any additional external thermal insulation such as an external thermally insulated composite system (ETICS). To reduce thermal bridge losses, the support length (a) of the slab on the wall is shorter than the wall thickness (t): a < t. The influence on the shear capacity of the respective masonry walls has not yet been tested and analysed. The paper presents the results of shear tests on monolithic external walls with a reduced support length under static-cyclic and pseudodynamic loading. The test results will be compared with the shear resistance calculated according to DIN EN 1996 with consideration of the German National Annex and the results according to the relevant Technical Approval.

show abstract

Section: Compilation Of the Calculation Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 97%

“…Für Wände mit k w ≤ 0,06 ist es demnach völlig ausreichend, die horizontale Tragfähigkeit mit der Gleichung für Biegedruckversagen zu ermitteln (s. Tabelle 8 und [17]). …”

Section: Zusammenfassungunclassified

Section: Vergleich Der Berechnungsergebnisseunclassified

See 2 more Smart Citations

Shear tests on external clay unit masonry walls / Monolithische Ziegelaußenwände unter Schubbeanspruchung

Kranzler

2016

Mauerwerk

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Since more than 590 000 residential units (about 15 % of the total) in Austria are located in buildings from the Gründerzeit, and thus have been built between 1840 and 1918 [1], [4], this subject is of great importance. In case of verifying the shear strength of masonry wall panels, however, the usual practice does not reflect the realistic capacity according to Kranzler [5] for example. Now they are undergoing a transition due to developments in urban conditions, which make structural adaptation with an analysis of the existing substance necessary.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Shear resistance verification of late 19th century masonry according to EC 6 – State of the art

Dunjic

Kolbitsch

2017

Mauerwerk

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A large part of buildings in Central European cities like Vienna was built in the Gründerzeit period between about 1840 and 1918 [1]. These buildings were constructed according to traditional rules. Current urban development requires historic buildings to be structurally adapted, which requires retroactive analysis of the masonry walls; in Austria according to ÖNORM EN 1998-3 [2] and ÖNORM EN 1996-3 (EC 6) [3]. Here, special focus is on the load transfer of horizontal earthquake loads, i. e. the shear strength of masonry walls. This paper describes the verification of historic masonry in detail and discusses individual components. Initial shear strength, load-influenced friction and the length of the compressed part of the wall are first determined using results from experimental testing and relevant literature and then compared to the approaches in EC 6. Based on this analysis, recommendations are provided to make theoretical approaches more realistic.

show abstract

Aussteifungsscheiben aus unbewehrtem Mauerwerk – Analyse und Bewertung von Berechnungsmodellen und Bemessungsmethoden

Cited by 2 publications

References 7 publications

Shear tests on external clay unit masonry walls / Monolithische Ziegelaußenwände unter Schubbeanspruchung

Shear tests on external clay unit masonry walls / Monolithische Ziegelaußenwände unter Schubbeanspruchung

Shear resistance verification of late 19th century masonry according to EC 6 – State of the art

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About