2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.02.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Austenitic high interstitial steels vs. CoCrMo – Comparison of fatigue behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This could be related to the low stacking fault energy of 8 mJ/ m 2 . It has been shown earlier that below 15 mJ/m 2 also the stacking fault energy plays a distinct role for metals with planar sliding characteristics [18]. Still it must be mentioned that the transformation induced plasticity steel CrMnNiCN0.11 shows marked cyclic hardening while the transformation induced plasticity cobalt chromium molybdenum alloys which also possesses a stacking fault energy !…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This could be related to the low stacking fault energy of 8 mJ/ m 2 . It has been shown earlier that below 15 mJ/m 2 also the stacking fault energy plays a distinct role for metals with planar sliding characteristics [18]. Still it must be mentioned that the transformation induced plasticity steel CrMnNiCN0.11 shows marked cyclic hardening while the transformation induced plasticity cobalt chromium molybdenum alloys which also possesses a stacking fault energy !…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Still the cyclic behavior cannot be directly related in a simple manner to these criteria. Since these steels have more or less the same stacking fault energy it does not count as criterion in contrast to for example cobalt-chromium-molybdenum (CoCrMo) alloys, which gain a higher fatigue limit from a markedly smaller amount of interstitials because of their very small stacking fault energy [18]. For a given stacking fault energy this would leave carbon + nitrogen and carbon/nitrogen as possible alloying criteria governing the density of free electrons and, therefore, the ductility as well as any twinning-induced plasticity or transformation-induced plasticity mechanism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most fatigue papers concentrate on finite life tests as they show dislocation activities galore. But here, the infinite life is aimed for and, therefore, no distinct differences as to the microstructures before and after fatigue tests can be shown [13,35]. One additional aspect to be regarded comes from the fact that at the fatigue limit, CrNiC and CrNiCN steels also slide only planarly, even though they are known for wavy slip in the finite life regime above a certain ε a,t [12].…”
Section: Materials Science Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fatigue resistance of forged alloys is considerably higher than that of cast alloys; for example, the fatigue strength of forged Co–Cr exceeds 600 MPa (in air) compared with 300 MPa of cast Co–Cr [9,10,11]. Forged Co–Cr has higher fatigue strength due to the wrought microstructure obtained via solid-state phase transformation from a face-centred cubic to a hexagonal close-packed (HCP) crystal structure during cold working [9,12]; therefore, the fatigue, yield and ultimate tensile strengths of the F799 alloy are approximately twice those of as-cast ASTM F75 [9]. However, for the alloy to be forged easily, its carbon content must be sufficiently low, which compromises the wear resistance [9,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forged Co–Cr has higher fatigue strength due to the wrought microstructure obtained via solid-state phase transformation from a face-centred cubic to a hexagonal close-packed (HCP) crystal structure during cold working [9,12]; therefore, the fatigue, yield and ultimate tensile strengths of the F799 alloy are approximately twice those of as-cast ASTM F75 [9]. However, for the alloy to be forged easily, its carbon content must be sufficiently low, which compromises the wear resistance [9,12]. Meanwhile, because of the brittle nature of the HCP structure, the generation and propagation of cracks are generally accelerated [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%