2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.10.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Australian-Antarctic breakup and seafloor spreading: Balancing geological and geophysical constraints

Abstract: The motion of diverging tectonic plates is typically constrained by geophysical data from preserved ocean crust. However, constraining plate motions during continental rifting and the breakup process relies on balancing evidence from a diverse range of geological and geophysical observations, often subject to differing interpretations. Reconstructing the evolution of rifting and breakup between Australia and Antarctica epitomizes the challenges involved in creating detailed models of Pangea breakup. In this ex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
54
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
(173 reference statements)
1
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The construction of deforming plate models for conjugate passive margins may often result in revisiting the fit and early opening history of a given margin pair to ensure that reconstructions are compliant with both geological and geophysical observations, which are complementary in the sense that geophysical data provide strong constraints for the tightness of the fit (via constraining the COB, UCCL, and crustal thickness of the rifted margin), while geological data are most useful in constraining the fit of conjugate margins along strike, for example, via matching geological features. How to build best fit models for conjugate passive margins by balancing these constraints is summarized in Williams et al ().…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The construction of deforming plate models for conjugate passive margins may often result in revisiting the fit and early opening history of a given margin pair to ensure that reconstructions are compliant with both geological and geophysical observations, which are complementary in the sense that geophysical data provide strong constraints for the tightness of the fit (via constraining the COB, UCCL, and crustal thickness of the rifted margin), while geological data are most useful in constraining the fit of conjugate margins along strike, for example, via matching geological features. How to build best fit models for conjugate passive margins by balancing these constraints is summarized in Williams et al ().…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many alternative models for the rifting and breakup history of this region have been published, putting emphasis on interpretations of different sets of regional geological or geophysical data. These models are evaluated in Williams et al (), illustrating why a balanced combination of geological and geophysical observations does not lead to reconstructions such as that by White et al (), which features an extant ocean basin between Australia and East Antarctica for much of the Mesozoic, for which there is no evidence. The central Indian Ocean plate deformation zone (Kreemer et al, ) is not included in our model as we are focused on deforming continental crust.…”
Section: Deforming Regions Within the Global Plate Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The activation of Tasmantid Guyots in the region (Vogt & Conolly, 1971) add 10.1029/2019GC008182 Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems to the tectonic complexity and specifically makes rapid deepening of tectonic blocks in the region implausible. Drifting between Tasmania and Antarctica commenced in the middle Eocene (~49 Ma; Williams et al, 2019). Ocean crust formation already generated a deep oceanographic conduit by that time and consequently gradual deepening of the conjugate margins is expected (Totterdell et al, 2000).…”
Section: Late Eocene Ocean Circulation Invigoration Preconditioned Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the age of final breakup and first oceanic crust is currently debated (Williams et al, 2019). The presence of high-quality seismic reflection data enabled the architecture of the ultra-distal domains to be interpreted as formed by a wide zone of exhumed mantle (Sayers et al, 2001;Direen et al, 2011;Ball et al, 2013;Gillard et al, 2015).…”
Section: East Antarctica Rifted Margin Off Wilkes Landmentioning
confidence: 99%