2012
DOI: 10.1080/0312407x.2011.653575
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Australian Social Work Supervision Practice in 2007

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A survey conducted in 2007 on 675 social workers in the entire Australia shows that 84% of the Australian social workers benefit from supervision, but 2/3 of them show that the role of supervisor is played by the manager, which can practically turn supervision into a relationship of control and evaluation (Egan, 2012). The author of the mentioned study also laments the lack of researchers on supervision, despite the importance of the practice.…”
Section: Perspectives On the Supervision Of Services In The Internatimentioning
confidence: 94%
“…A survey conducted in 2007 on 675 social workers in the entire Australia shows that 84% of the Australian social workers benefit from supervision, but 2/3 of them show that the role of supervisor is played by the manager, which can practically turn supervision into a relationship of control and evaluation (Egan, 2012). The author of the mentioned study also laments the lack of researchers on supervision, despite the importance of the practice.…”
Section: Perspectives On the Supervision Of Services In The Internatimentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Internal and external supervision provide opportunities to reflect on different aspects of practice. Characteristically, internal supervision has a focus on administrative and organisational matters while external concentrates on professional practice issues (Beddoe, 2012;Egan, 2012).…”
Section: Qualitative Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically, supervision has been provided internally, only in the social worker's workplace (Egan, 2012). Many social service organisations continue to have policies related to social workers receiving traditional forms of supervision from their line managers.…”
Section: Internal Versus External Supervisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature reports the prominence of supervision operating within organisational cultures, symptomatic of the "over-vigilant and bureaucratic" culture with a high focus on tasks, policies and rules, and a low focus on personal relatedness (Hawkins & Shohet, 2012, p. 230). In this type of culture, resourcing can become dependent on efficiencies and performance measures (Egan, 2012) and the complex qualitative processes inherent to supervision can appear time-consuming and unproductive.…”
Section: The Organisational Culturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As well as challenges, some studies do suggest benefits of internally provided supervision. Egan (2012), in a study of 675 social workers in managerial settings in Australia found that of the 66% workers who had supervision by their line manager, almost half said that internally provided supervision was the most useful; despite the fact that 50% of workers had had feedback linked to their performance appraisals. This suggests that the potential conflicts inherent in dual role relationships within internal supervision of staff by line managers need not be detrimental to supervision and can have their own strengths.…”
Section: Topics For Further Focusmentioning
confidence: 99%