2002
DOI: 10.3102/0013189x031004003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Authorizing Students’ Perspectives: Toward Trust, Dialogue, and Change in Education

Abstract: This article argues for attending to the perspectives of those most directly affected by, but least often consulted about, educational policy and practice: students. The argument for authorizing student perspectives runs counter to U.S. reform efforts, which have been based on adults’ ideas about the conceptualization and practice of education. This article outlines and critiques a variety of recent attempts to listen to students, including constructivist and critical pedagogies, postmodern and poststructural … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
417
1
16

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 644 publications
(435 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
417
1
16
Order By: Relevance
“…One outcome of a lack of connection between research and classrooms is that the precise nature of students' knowledge about their cognitive and metacognitive skills during their everyday engagement with typical class lessons is not well documented (Cook-Sather, 2002). Karmiloff-Smith (1992) argued that for optimal use of knowledge, the knowledge must at some point be made explicit and able to be discussed, used and refined.…”
Section: Study 1: a Survey In Three Secondary Schools In 2007mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One outcome of a lack of connection between research and classrooms is that the precise nature of students' knowledge about their cognitive and metacognitive skills during their everyday engagement with typical class lessons is not well documented (Cook-Sather, 2002). Karmiloff-Smith (1992) argued that for optimal use of knowledge, the knowledge must at some point be made explicit and able to be discussed, used and refined.…”
Section: Study 1: a Survey In Three Secondary Schools In 2007mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Co-designers' expectations were raised in the design meeting and this may have directed their attention to cues of successful implementation (i.e., selective attention, Olson et al 1996). Second, increases in sense of control (Seifert and O'Keefe 2001), sense of agency, belonging, and competencies (Mitra 2004), as well as a better understanding of the teacher's work and perspective (Cook-Sather 2002) can lead to increased engagement and a smaller distance to the teacher's view on instruction. Third, interpersonal and affective aspects are very important when students evaluate their teacher or the course created by their teacher (Johannessen et al 2002).…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Esta postura é irónica (e errónea), se atendermos ao facto de que, se os discentes estivessem motivados para a aprendizagem e se sentissem ouvidos, comprometer-se-iam muito mais no processo de ensino/aprendizagem. Aliás, estudos desenvolvidos por vários investigadores (Cook-Sather, 2002;Mitra, 2004;Mclntyre, Pedder & Rudduck, 2005;Flechter, 2005;Rudduck & Mclntyre, 2007) provam isso mesmo, demonstrando que a consulta aos alunos transforma a sala de aula num espaço onde o ensino e a aprendizagem se tornam mais agradáveis e efectivos, constituindo uma tarefa em que professores e alunos colaboram mutuamente (Day, 2001).…”
Section: Breve Sinopse Da Voz Dos Alunosunclassified