2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.04.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autism is not associated with poor or enhanced performance on the Iowa Gambling Task: A Meta-Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In image searches, no such trend emerged. The increased search range in general searches made by individuals with s-sASD supports the validity of laboratory studies showing that high-functioning individuals with ASD are prone to inspective behaviors [5,19]. However, the fact that this phenomenon was not found in such individuals conducting image searches suggests that there is an The differences between image searches and general searches may have been due to the fact that image searches involve greater visual load than typical general searches.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…In image searches, no such trend emerged. The increased search range in general searches made by individuals with s-sASD supports the validity of laboratory studies showing that high-functioning individuals with ASD are prone to inspective behaviors [5,19]. However, the fact that this phenomenon was not found in such individuals conducting image searches suggests that there is an The differences between image searches and general searches may have been due to the fact that image searches involve greater visual load than typical general searches.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…In such tasks, several studies reported superior performance of individuals with ASD, who are less drawn to the immediate salience of rewards, and learn long-term reward contingencies more accurately from choice outcomes [21,28,29]. (However, see [30][31][32] for studies that did not find this advantage. )…”
Section: Trends In Cognitive Sciencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference in choice switching on the IGT between autistic and non-autistic individuals has been replicated in some studies [ 9 , 10 ], though not in others [ 11 , 12 ]. A recent meta-analysis [ 13 ] concluded that the main effect across studies was not significant, but only six studies with switching data were identified and their results were highly heterogeneous, with three showing a significant effect and three that did not. The studies were also different in their inclusion criteria, for example some studies excluded individuals with autism and OCD whose checking behaviors might conceivably result in higher switching [ 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%