2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.01.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Auto-segmentation of pancreatic tumor in multi-parametric MRI using deep convolutional neural networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
49
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One major contributor to the rapid development of oART has been the increased use of artificial intelligence (AI) [14]. Applications of AI in this field include automated organ segmentation [15][16][17], the use of synthetic image data [18,19] as well as automated treatment planning [20][21][22]. The purpose of this project was to describe the clinical implementation of a commercial solution for CBCT-guided and AIdriven oART.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One major contributor to the rapid development of oART has been the increased use of artificial intelligence (AI) [14]. Applications of AI in this field include automated organ segmentation [15][16][17], the use of synthetic image data [18,19] as well as automated treatment planning [20][21][22]. The purpose of this project was to describe the clinical implementation of a commercial solution for CBCT-guided and AIdriven oART.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicates the NE T2W-FS images could be a potential substitute for CE-T1W images when using CNN for the automatic delineation of primary NPC. Most previous studies on CNN-based primary tumor delineation have relied on the CE MRI [17][18][19][33][34][35], but our results are encouraging and suggest that future adaptations of CNN for NE sequence are warranted to facilitate the reduction of contrast administration for MRI where possible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…With regard to the performance of the CNN primary NPC delineation using CE imaging, our results (DSC, 0.71; ASD, 2.1 mm), are better than those previously reported for U-Net and similar or slightly worse than those reported for using a customized CNN. We used U-Net as our testing reference because it is one of the most general and representative 2D delineation CNN architectures and its encoder-decoder design is the back-bone of many proposed delineation CNN architectures [15,18,[34][35][36][37][38]. Only one other NPC study used the U-Net for primary tumor delineation and reported a DSC of 0.59 and ASD of 6 mm [18] on CE images.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another limitation of this experience is represented by the lack of an analysis related to the reproducibility of the radiomic features, which represents a necessary step for the clinical implementation in studies based on manual segmentation processes. In this context, a great evolution is expected from automatic contouring systems that are able to ensure precise and standardised contours in a very short time: the feasibility of these approaches on MRI has been recently demonstrated by some experiences, even focused on the abdominal district [53,54].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%