Autoavaliação da comunicação em promotores de justiça em um estado do nordeste, Brasil

Sales, Neuza Josina; Castaneda, Daniel Francisco Neyra; Barreto, Íkaro Daniel de Carvalho; Paoliello, Marina; Campanha, Silvia Márcia Andrade

doi:10.1590/2317-1782/20162015238

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As in the result of the present study was not statistically significant between the gender, but it can be observed that women tended to have a greater negative impact than men. Public speaking seems to be more challenging for women, they feel insecure and tense, probably because they perceive more negative elements during communication 14,15 .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Self-statements of medical students about the fear of speaking in public

Rosa Rossi-Barbosa,

Alves Carvalho Laube,

Camargo

et al. 2023

Bionorte

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: to evaluate the perception of medical students from two institutions in the north of Minas Gerais regarding the fear of public speaking and the association with sociodemographic, economic and anxiety level variables. Materials and Methods: cross-sectional, analytical study, consisting of 346 students using identification data, Self-Statements during Public Speaking Scale (SSPS) and Beck Anxiety Inventory. Results: the mean age was 22.36 years with a predominance of females. The total SSPS score was 17.72 for the positive rating subscale and 5.28 for the negative subscale. Academics over 22 years old, with more than six minimum wages and with minimal to mild anxiety had a higher average on the positive subscale and those aged up to 22 years, less than six minimum wages, with moderate to severe anxiety and those in the initial periods had a higher average on the negative subscale. The practice of public speaking carried out in the first period was evaluated as positive. Conclusion: the variables age, income and level of anxiety were statistically significant for the positive and negative subscales of fear of public speaking, and academics in the initial periods of the course were significant for the negative subscale.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Self-statements of medical students about the fear of speaking in public

Rosa Rossi-Barbosa,

Alves Carvalho Laube,

Camargo

et al. 2023

Bionorte

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Instrumentos de avaliação e autoavaliação da fala em público: uma revisão integrativa da literatura

Marinho

Medeiros

Lima

et al. 2022

Audiol., Commun. Res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

RESUMO Objetivo revisar e descrever os estudos que utilizaram instrumentos para avaliar e autoavaliar a fala em público de indivíduos adultos, no período de 2011 a 2020. Estratégia de pesquisa trata-se de uma revisão integrativa da literatura. A busca dos estudos ocorreu nas bases de dados SciELO, PubMed e Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde, que abrange as bases de dados MEDLINE e LILACS. A questão norteadora desta revisão foi: “Quais os tipos, aspectos avaliados e categorias de resposta dos instrumentos que avaliaram a fala em público de indivíduos adultos nos últimos dez anos?”. Critérios de seleção Foram selecionados artigos originais, disponíveis na íntegra, publicados nos últimos dez anos, nos idiomas português, inglês ou espanhol, que apresentassem instrumentos de avaliação da fala em público, em adultos. Foram excluídos da revisão teses, dissertações, monografias, anais de congressos, estudos com análise do discurso e artigos de revisão de literatura. Resultados foram localizados 2539 artigos, dos quais 21 foram incluídos nesta revisão. A maioria dos estudos foi desenvolvida no Brasil, realizada com universitários e utilizou instrumentos de autoavaliação para investigar a fala em público. Conclusão os instrumentos de investigação para avaliação da fala em público são distintos e não há padronização conceitual dos aspectos avaliativos e das categorias de respostas. Nos instrumentos de autoavaliação, os aspectos mais avaliados são ansiedade ao falar em público, voz, velocidade de fala, competência comunicativa, pitch, articulação e loudness. Nos instrumentos de avaliação, os aspectos avaliativos mais abordados são voz, velocidade de fala, articulação, pausas, loudness, pitch e gestos.

show abstract

Risk of Dysphonia in Legal Professionals: Proposal for a Screening Protocol

Martini Ramalho Gullino,

Simões-Zenari,

De Albuquerque Rodrigues

et al. 2023

Rev. Investig. Innov. Cienc. Salud

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction. Due to the communicative requirements inherent to the profession, the legal professional benefits from speech therapy monitoring for the proper use of the voice and to avoid the occurrence of vocal disorders. The development of specific instruments will contribute with more relevant data to guide this monitoring. Objective. To verify the applicability of the General Dysphonia Risk Screening Protocol (DRSP-G) and the Specific Dysphonia Risk Screening Protocol for Legal Professionals (DRSP-LP) and to correlate the average scores of both with vocal deviation, sex, age, professional performance time, vocal signs and symptoms, and vocal self-assessment. Methods. Fifty legal professionals participated. All participants completed the DRSP-G and DRSP-LP and recorded their voices for detection of the presence of altered vocal quality. Results. Most participants presented a high risk of dysphonia, which was higher in men. Altered vocal quality was observed in 34% of the participants. The items with the highest scores in the DRSP-G were talking a lot (76%), excessive daily coffee intake (70%), contact with smokers (60%), and insufficient hydration and sleep (48%); in the DRSP-LP, alcohol consumption (68%) and exposure to air conditioning (64%). There was no correlation between risk scores and the degree of dysphonia, or with age or length of professional experience. The DRSP-G score correlated with vocal signs and symptoms and vocal self-perception. Conclusions. The joint application of the DRSP-G and the DRSP-LP enabled a quantitative and qualitative analysis of risk factors for dysphonia in legal professionals.

show abstract

Autoavaliação da comunicação em promotores de justiça em um estado do nordeste, Brasil

Cited by 3 publications

References 15 publications

Self-statements of medical students about the fear of speaking in public

Self-statements of medical students about the fear of speaking in public

Instrumentos de avaliação e autoavaliação da fala em público: uma revisão integrativa da literatura

Risk of Dysphonia in Legal Professionals: Proposal for a Screening Protocol

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About