2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jempfin.2013.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autocorrelation and partial price adjustment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
23
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Rösch, Subrahmanyam, and van Dijk (2013) provide evidence that such informational efficiency metrics measured at intraday horizons are highly correlated with lowfrequency measures of informational efficiency and are different from liquidity measures. Anderson, Eom, Hahn, and Park (2013) find that partial price adjustment (slow price adjustment and overshooting), which implies a degree of informational inefficiency, is a major source of positive and negative autocorrelations. In robustness tests we confirm that our results hold at lower frequencies (estimating the measures for each stock-month using daily data), although such tests have lower statistical power and less precision.…”
Section: Informational Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Rösch, Subrahmanyam, and van Dijk (2013) provide evidence that such informational efficiency metrics measured at intraday horizons are highly correlated with lowfrequency measures of informational efficiency and are different from liquidity measures. Anderson, Eom, Hahn, and Park (2013) find that partial price adjustment (slow price adjustment and overshooting), which implies a degree of informational inefficiency, is a major source of positive and negative autocorrelations. In robustness tests we confirm that our results hold at lower frequencies (estimating the measures for each stock-month using daily data), although such tests have lower statistical power and less precision.…”
Section: Informational Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The estimated effect of dark trading is to make the autocorrelations and variance ratios more negative (these results are not tabulated), consistent with a decrease in informational efficiency. An interpretation of these results is that prices (midquotes) tend to overreact to new information or order flow and subsequently reverse the overreaction (Anderson, Eom, Hahn, and Park, 2013), and high levels of dark trading tend to exacerbate the inefficient overreactions and reversals. Negative autocorrelations also arise from imperfect riskbearing capacity of liquidity providers (e.g., Ho and Stoll, 1981).…”
Section: Autocorrelationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When designing an HFT model, an important challenge that a model designer is faced with is the claim that return autocorrelations in HFT can have both genuine and spurious elements (Anderson, 2011;Anderson et al, 2013). The latter is attributed to market microstructure noise (McAleer and Medeiros, 2008), mainly resulting from non-synchronous trading effect and bid-ask bounce.…”
Section: High Frequency Data and Technical Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This noise is attributed as one of the key modelling challenges and sources of uncertainty in HFT (Anderson, 2011;Anderson et al, 2013;Rechenthin and Street, 2013). T1 fuzzy sets cannot fully represent the uncertainty associated with the inputs since as a contradiction, the membership function of a T1 fuzzy set has no uncertainty associated with it.…”
Section: Generalizing Anfis Model To T2 Flsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, return autocorrelation arising from time-varying expected returns and partial price adjustment is termed as genuine autocorrelation (see Campbell et al 1997). In this paper, we use the term weak-form efficiency and return predictability interchangeably, as autocorrelations in US stock returns are primarily attributed to partial price adjustment rather than market microstructure biases or time-varying expected returns (see Mech 1993, Anderson et al 2013. and stability of US macroeconomic fundamentals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%