2017
DOI: 10.4135/9781483398594
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autoethnography: Process, Product, and Possibility for Critical Social Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
124
0
10

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
124
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…In anthropology and cultural studies, auto-ethnography (often also written in the hyphen-less form, autoethnography) seems to be enjoying something of a renaissance. With the publication of new methodological volumes and guides such as Muncey (2010), Denzin (2013), Adams, Jones, and Ellis (2014), Bochner and Ellis (2016), Hughes and Pennington (2016) and Pensoneau-Conway, Adams, and Bolen (2017), the approach of auto-ethnography has never been more vibrant or well informed. The netnographic offshoot, auto-netnography, began as a more introspective extension of netnography in the work of Kozinets and Kedzior (2009) as the participative elements of the original method were adapted to studying the more internal, micro-psychological adjustments for experiencing virtual worlds.…”
Section: Concerning Auto-netnographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In anthropology and cultural studies, auto-ethnography (often also written in the hyphen-less form, autoethnography) seems to be enjoying something of a renaissance. With the publication of new methodological volumes and guides such as Muncey (2010), Denzin (2013), Adams, Jones, and Ellis (2014), Bochner and Ellis (2016), Hughes and Pennington (2016) and Pensoneau-Conway, Adams, and Bolen (2017), the approach of auto-ethnography has never been more vibrant or well informed. The netnographic offshoot, auto-netnography, began as a more introspective extension of netnography in the work of Kozinets and Kedzior (2009) as the participative elements of the original method were adapted to studying the more internal, micro-psychological adjustments for experiencing virtual worlds.…”
Section: Concerning Auto-netnographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Autoethnography in particular, rests within a reflexive frame of qualitative research, allowing for the exploration of historically and culturally embedded social processes (Anderson, 2006;Witkin, 2014). For this reason, it is considered an approach to ontological research, employed in order to understand how our lives are ordered and knowledge is socially constitutive (Hughes and Pennington, 2017). To do so, autoethnographic researchers open up their own cultural experiences for analysis by presenting a visible rendering of that experience to the reader.…”
Section: Introduction: the Computer Social Workermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A pesquisa que alicerça este artigo se insere no campo da Linguística Aplicada Crítica (Pennycook, 2001) e é de cunho qualitativo (Méndez, 2013) e autoetnográfico (Hughes;Pennington, 2017;Méndez, 2013). A articulação entre esses campos ocorre por se tratar de um estudo sobre a linguagem e seus usos, enfocando questões de (de)colonialidade no ensino de língua inglesa no âmbito de um componente curricular voltado à formação de professores, Estágio Supervisionado, sob uma perspectiva autoetnográfica, porque aciono a minha própria experiência como docente desse componente para tecer reflexões críticas.…”
Section: Metodologia: Decolonizando O Método Em Pesquisa Qualitativa unclassified