2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10302-006-0135-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autogenous bone grafting from proximal tibia in elective foot and ankle surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies using the lateral approach to harvest bone graft from the proximal tibia found that the non-compressed volume was 5-42 ml 3,9,10,14,21 and compressed cancellous bone was 3.5-15 ml 4,9,14 . For the medial approach, previous studies showed the volume of non-compressed bone grafts ranged from 14 to 40 ml 6,7,20 and from 12 to 35 ml for the compressed bone volume 5,7,12 , which are higher than those of the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies using the lateral approach to harvest bone graft from the proximal tibia found that the non-compressed volume was 5-42 ml 3,9,10,14,21 and compressed cancellous bone was 3.5-15 ml 4,9,14 . For the medial approach, previous studies showed the volume of non-compressed bone grafts ranged from 14 to 40 ml 6,7,20 and from 12 to 35 ml for the compressed bone volume 5,7,12 , which are higher than those of the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cancellous bone graft was harvested from the lateral proximal tibia of the ipsilateral leg using the technique described by Vienne and collegues. 38 After drilling the joint surfaces of the subtalar joint with a 2-mm drill bit, the harvested cancellous bone graft was placed into the joint space. Two 6.5-mm cancellous compression screws with a 16-mm thread were inserted across the joint from the calcaneal tuberosity.…”
Section: Surgical Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 With either of these approaches, there is no difference with regard to the clinical results or the complications. 6,12 Soohoo and Cracchiolo 8 have quoted 93% union rate in foot and ankle procedures with PTBGH and confirm difficulties with lateral approach. Vienne et al 12 have reported high patient satisfaction with lateral approach and suggested that it can be done under local or locoregional anesthesia.…”
Section: Jfas (Ap)mentioning
confidence: 91%