2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autogenous Premolar Transplantation into Artificial Socket in Maxillary Lateral Incisor Site

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
15
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
15
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The donor tooth can be an embedded, impacted, or erupted tooth, and the recipient site can be a previous extraction site, a surgically prepared socket, or the site of a congenitally missing tooth [ 2 – 4 ]. The most common donor teeth used in clinical practice are third molars [ 5 7 ], premolars [ 8 , 9 ], impacted canines [ 10 ], and supernumerary teeth [ 11 ]. Both mandibular and maxillary teeth have been successfully used as donor teeth, and teeth have also been successfully autotransplanted into mandibular and maxillary sites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The donor tooth can be an embedded, impacted, or erupted tooth, and the recipient site can be a previous extraction site, a surgically prepared socket, or the site of a congenitally missing tooth [ 2 – 4 ]. The most common donor teeth used in clinical practice are third molars [ 5 7 ], premolars [ 8 , 9 ], impacted canines [ 10 ], and supernumerary teeth [ 11 ]. Both mandibular and maxillary teeth have been successfully used as donor teeth, and teeth have also been successfully autotransplanted into mandibular and maxillary sites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several reasons could account for this variation such as differences in sample size/tooth type, variations in post-operative periods and different definitions of success. [2][3][4][5][6][7]9,10 In this case, the autotransplanted teeth were mandibular second premolars with incomplete root formation. The degree of root formation could be a determinant factor for the prognosis of the autotransplanted tooth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…A large variation of success and survival rates has been reported in the literature. Several reasons could account for this variation such as differences in sample size/tooth type, variations in post‐operative periods and different definitions of success …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Three common treatment options for replacing this tooth include: canine substitution (space closure), a tooth‐supported resin‐bonded fixed dental prosthesis (RBFDP), or a single implant. Autotransplantation, a less common approach, has also been reported to be a successful and cost‐effective alternative . The option with the best long‐term esthetic and functional outcome should be the treatment of choice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%