2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-34688-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AutoImpute: Autoencoder based imputation of single-cell RNA-seq data

Abstract: The emergence of single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) technologies has enabled us to measure the expression levels of thousands of genes at single-cell resolution. However, insufficient quantities of starting RNA in the individual cells cause significant dropout events, introducing a large number of zero counts in the expression matrix. To circumvent this, we developed an autoencoder-based sparse gene expression matrix imputation method. AutoImpute, which learns the inherent distribution of the input scRNA-s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
99
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
99
0
Order By: Relevance
“…variation mirrored those of real datasets. To overcome the limitations of previously described simulation approaches 15,16,[18][19][20]24 (Supplementary Note 1), we used the output of a denoising method as the ground truth, and then simulated realistic efficiency and sampling noise (Methods). We applied this approach to simulate data based on a renal cell carcinoma biopsy sample 25 , which contained a heterogeneous set of populations from the tumor microenvironment ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…variation mirrored those of real datasets. To overcome the limitations of previously described simulation approaches 15,16,[18][19][20]24 (Supplementary Note 1), we used the output of a denoising method as the ground truth, and then simulated realistic efficiency and sampling noise (Methods). We applied this approach to simulate data based on a renal cell carcinoma biopsy sample 25 , which contained a heterogeneous set of populations from the tumor microenvironment ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these methods do not generate denoised gene expression values, and thus cannot be used to perform genelevel analyses, for example with scatter plots or heatmaps 15 . To overcome this limitation, a diverse array of methods have been proposed to computationally remove noise by sharing information across cells and genes 10,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21] . The general lack of an experimental ground truth has made it difficult to establish and compare the accuracies of these approaches, and it is currently unclear what levels of theoretical and algorithmic complexity are necessary or appropriate to address the denoising problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Autoencoder was also used to discover two liver cancer sub-types that had distinguishable chances of survival [58]. Moreover, some recent successful data imputation methods have been developed based on autoencoders [59][60][61]. Autoimpute [59] can be an example which imputes single cell RNA-seq gene expression.…”
Section: Autoencoder (Ae)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, some recent successful data imputation methods have been developed based on autoencoders [59][60][61]. Autoimpute [59] can be an example which imputes single cell RNA-seq gene expression. Autoencoder-based methods such as [60] and [61] have surpassed older machine learning techniques on various real life datasets.…”
Section: Autoencoder (Ae)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a group of methods were proposed to target that problem inspired from the emerging success of generative models. Among these methods are AutoImpute [18], scVI [13] and DCA [4]. scVI uses stochastic optimization and learns cell-specific embeddings using deep neural networks that best explains the observed data, whereas both AutoImpute and DCA uses autoencoders as their interior models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%